Saturday, December 31, 2005

Foreign Students scared to leave their homes

Foreign students scared to leave their homes



An African student was stabbed to death and another seriously wounded in St Petersburg over the Christmas weekend, raising fears that hate crimes are spreading across Russia. A Cameroonian student was killed just hours after another two Africans were slashed with a knife on the same street. All three victims were members of St Petersburg's Water Transport University, where many foreigners study and live together in dormitories. Many are now terrified to go out onto the streets of St Petersburg.

"We don't know who the next victim will be," said Toni Dukimo, an African student who was a friend of the murdered victim. "Maybe it will be me, when I am going home tonight."

Russian police, who have been criticised for a muted response to a spate of similar attacks, were reluctant to describe the stabbing as racially motivated. "It could be hooliganism, a settling of scores, extremism," said Sergei Zaitsev, a local police spokesman. But human rights groups in Russia say the murder has all the hallmarks of a rise in racially motivated attacks by skinhead groups over the past few years which has been "practically ignored" by authorities and police.

Andrew Suberu, deputy head of African Unity, a support group for African students in St Petersburg, said skinheads were definitely involved.

"According to my information, the attackers looked like skinheads. Now such attacks are a usual story in St Petersburg," he said.

According to the Moscow Bureau of Human Rights (MBHR), 59 people have been killed in racist attacks in Russia in the past two years. In October, an 18-year-old Peruvian student was murdered in a southern university town popular with British students. Enrique Urtado was set upon by a gang of 20 youths who beat him and his friends with metal poles and wooden stakes.

Researchers have warned that Voronezh, a depressed city with high unemployment rates 300 miles south of Moscow, had become the country's main skinhead recruiting ground, labelling the city a "crucible of race hatred". Russia is estimated to be home to more than 50,000 skinheads, with 10,000 in Moscow and 5,000 in St Petersburg alone.
Critics argue the lethargic attitude of the police in chasing and prosecuting racist attacks has encouraged neo-Nazi groups to flourish. Using names such as "Blood and Honour", "Moscow Hammer Skin" and "Skin Legion" some observers fear their numbers could rise to over 100,000 within a few years.

It is not just extremist racism on the peripheries of society that is worrying observers. A leading racism monitoring website in Russia surveyed opinion in the first half of 2005 and found up to 60 per cent of Russians held some type of xenophobic viewpoint. Among the least-liked ethnic minorities were Chechens, Azeris and Armenians. Much of the neo-Nazi literature circulating among extremist groups in Russia has concentrated on insisting Russia is a purely white country.

Political parties have also increasingly resorted to tough immigration policies and xenophobic rhetoric to win votes. The MBHR recently published a report monitoring xenophobia during the Moscow local elections and found "a number of political parties adhering to xenophobic slogans in their election campaigns". Slogans such as "Russia for Russians" and "Russian faces in the Russian capital" were increasingly popular, they said.

In June this year, public figures from St Petersburg wrote an open letter to President Vladimir Putin warning him of the rise of neo-Nazism in Russia. "You certainly know that in the last years along with traditional anti-Semitism and xenophobia another kind of racism is thriving in Russia," they wrote. "The racism of Nazi nature is the ideological basis for crimes sweeping over our country."
The Independent

Germans to put Muslims through loyalty test

Germans to put Muslims through loyalty test
By Kate Connolly in Berlin(Filed: 31/12/2005)
Muslims intent on becoming German citizens will have to undergo a rigorous cultural test to gauge their views on subjects ranging from bigamy to homosexuality.
Believed to be the first test of its kind in Europe, the southern state of Baden-Württemberg has created the two-hour oral exam to test the loyalty of Muslims towards Germany.

It is to be taken on top of the standard test for foreigners wishing to become German citizens, which includes language proficiency skills and general knowledge.
It also requires applicants to prove that they can provide for themselves and their families.
Those applying must also have resided in Germany for the previous eight years and have no criminal record.
Germany's 15 other states will monitor the progress of the policy when the tests begin this week before deciding whether they wish to adopt similar legislation.
The 30 questions, which have been set by a special commission, range from sexual equality to school sports and are meant to trigger a more detailed discussion between the applicants and officials.
Until now, all applicants have simply had to tick a Yes or No box to answer whether they felt loyalty to Germany.
But now they will be quizzed on their attitudes to homosexuality and western clothing for young women, and whether husbands should be allowed to beat their wives.
Other questions covering topics such as bigamy and whether parents should allow their children to participate in school sports have been called "trick questions", meant to catch people off guard.
The state interior ministry said the test would be used to filter out Muslims who were unsuited for life in Germany. Those who answered "correctly" but later acted against expected behaviour, such as wife-beating, could have their citizenship removed.
Critics say that the test is biased and discriminatory and that if Muslims are obliged to take it, so should all applicants for citizenship.
Brigitte Lösch, a leading member of the Green party in the Baden-Wurttemberg parliament, called for the oral exam to be dropped, arguing that it inferred from the outset that all Muslims were "violent per se" and unable to abide by German law.
"This list of questions is only to be used for applicants from Islamic countries. It is an unbelievable form of discrimination," she said. "If Germans were asked some of the questions, they would find it difficult to answer them."
The European Assembly of Turkish Academics rejected the questionnaire as "strongly discriminatory and racist" against Germany's three million-strong Muslim population, most of whom are Turkish.
Kerim Arpad, an assembly spokesman, said: "The test is shaped by stereotypes and damages integration."
But Dieter Biller, of the foreign ministry in Stuttgart, the state capital, said the test would help bureaucrats to form opinions as to whether citizenship applicants were suitable or not.
"It covers everything from sexual equality, violence, school sports and religious freedom," he said. "How the applicants stand on the question of the attacks of September 11 will also be a key question."
Holland announced yesterday that it was introducing ceremonies for new immigrants as part of efforts to reduce racial tensions and to integrate immigrant communities.
The government is worried that immigrants who do not move outside their ethnic or religious groups hamper integration and stoke fears of militancy. New Dutch citizens will also have to take an "oath of allegiance".
kate.connolly@telegraph.co.uk

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Indians Eagerly Await Abdullah

Indians Eagerly Await Abdullah

Abdullah Rizvi

Arab News

JUBAIL, 21 December 2005 — Indians are eagerly looking forward to the visit of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah, according to Indian Ambassador M.O.H. Farook. “King Abdullah’s visit to India next month will be the first by a Saudi monarch in 40 years and will pave the way for further strengthening bilateral bonds,” Farook told a meeting organized by India Forum Jubail on Friday.

A seminar marked the meeting in which speakers discussed various issues facing the community. “Lack of facilities for higher education for our children is one of the major problems and that’s why they have to be sent back home,” a speaker said.

The ambassador hoped that a solution would be found, especially in the matter of higher education for girls. He also called for imparting quality education to make local students competitive in various admission tests back home.

Other speakers pleaded for increased utilization of Indian expertise in the Kingdom’s ongoing development projects. “We’re the largest expatriate community here, but our share of participation in local projects is minimal and needs a review,” one of them pointed out.

Friday, December 16, 2005

The formation of political alliance by the muslims of Assam

The formation of Peoples Democratic Front ( PDF ) by the Muslims of Assam viz Northeast in oct 05 have given a new political dimension . Muslims of Assam are of high expectation from this party . PDF did came into being out of frustration from the present political situation , but can PDF fulfill the expectation of the Muslims or at least can give a positive parameters of the expectation .
The Muslims forms a major population of Assam , without whom no one can sit in Dispur . From 1947 till date Assam have seen Nellie , Kokrajhar , Bongaigoan , Nalbari , Gohpur , the Assam Agitation of 1979 - 85 etc and the recent exodus of Muslims from upper Assam and the police constable recruitment of 2005 . The Congress and AGP both of them have rule Assam . From Congress - the Muslims have got riots . The AGP have come out of Assam Agitation { Muslims should never forget Nellie } . The AGP had political alliance with the hindutva BJP . So , now the question arise - will the PDF form a political alliance with other political party minus Congress , AGP and NDA . The coming months will be crucial for PDF .
By -AFDAL HUSSAIN
GUWAHATI . ASSAM
email : prevet@gawab.com

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Contrasts in acceptance mark Islam in Belgium and America

By M.A. MUQTEDAR KHAN
12/14/2005

I recently participated in a dialogue between American and Belgian Muslims in Belgium (Nov. 16-18), co-hosted by U.S. Ambassador to Belgium Tom Korologos and Ambassador Claude Mission, the director general of the Royal Institute for International Relations. An interesting group of 32 American Muslim scholars and intellectuals, community leaders, journalists and activists joined 70 of their counterparts from the Belgian Muslim community to discuss their mutual condition and explore possibilities for further dialogue and civic cooperation.

Belgium has a population of ten million and 5 percent of them -- more than 500,000 -- are Muslims. Muslims also constitute about 20 percent of the population of Brussels, the capital of the European Union. More than 300,000 Belgian Muslims are of Moroccan ancestry and more than 160,000 are Turkish. The rest include Balkan Muslims, South Asians and some non-Moroccan Arabs.

Like in France, Muslims in Belgium have enough presence to now become the "other" against whom Belgian indigenous identity is constructed. Repeatedly one heard Muslim and non-Muslim Belgians refer to even second-generation Turkish and Moroccan Muslims as "foreigners" or immigrants even though they were Belgian-born, Dutch- and French-speaking legal citizen

Unlike American Muslims, Belgian Muslims enjoy a strong representation in the government. They boast two national senators and five members in the lower house of Parliament. But unlike American Muslims they have very few civil society institutions. There are no Muslim organizations that fight for civil rights and oppose discrimination. Even though there are more than 350 mosques in tiny Belgium, Belgian Muslims remain underrepresented in most institutions of the civil society as well as the Belgian state.

A peculiar aspect of the Belgian Muslim community is the presence of government-paid imams and teachers. The Belgian government employs more than 800 imams and teachers who teach Islam and Arabic in schools and lead prayers in mosques recognized by the government. It is clear that the Belgian government has tried to co-opt Islam by hiring the Islamic teachers, financing and supporting mosques and by now creating an executive who will govern Islamic affairs in Belgium.

The common themes discussed were issues of rising Islamophobia and the meaning of acceptance, multiculturalism and pluralism. Both communities found the challenge of constructing identities which incorporated both the Islamic dimension and citizenship in the West fascinating.

Americans found that the presence of a large indigenous Muslim population in the United States, nearly 35 percent of American Muslims are black, white and Hispanic, made the collective identity formation of American Muslims more complicated than that of Belgian Muslims, whose fault lines were primarily ethnic.

While American Muslims lamented their inability to have a role in policy-making in the United States, Belgian Muslims' primary concern was systematic discrimination in the marketplace. Muslims with law degrees could not find jobs. Applications for jobs and for renting apartments were rejected based on their Muslim names. American Muslims were shocked to hear some of the stories of discrimination Belgian Muslims faced on a daily basis.

As I sat listening to the stories of Muslim life in Belgium, I caught myself repeatedly touching the tiny U.S. flag on my lapel. Uncle Sam sure looked mighty friendly and hospitable from across the pond. While discrimination against Muslims in America has certainly risen since 9/11, it looked insignificant compared with what Muslims in Belgium faced routinely.

Belgium's Muslims have a dearth of scholars and intellectuals, and as a result they are far behind American Muslims on the subject of adapting their faith to the local context. Not only are there many scholars pushing for this in the United States, but also national organizations and prominent Islamic centers recognize the need to adapt Islam to American conditions.

An excellent example of this is the adoption of the guidelines for women-friendly mosques, developed last year by Muslim organizations, by many Islamic centers. We can see American Islam in the progressive role that women play in American Muslim community, and in Islamic scholarship. Another important indicator is the absence of embedded radicalism in American Islam.

Muslims in Europe are connected to the state but marginalized from mainstream society. American Muslims are alienated from the state but are quite integrated in the society. European Muslims benefit from state largesse, while American Muslims have enjoyed the fruits of American multiculturalism, religious tolerance, and economic and educational opportunities. Muslims in Europe cause a sense of uneasiness among the host population that is racist, xenophobic and fearful. American Muslims are more accepted. As it becomes more and more evident that American Muslims had nothing to do with 9/11, the barriers to their re-entry into the mainstream are melting away.

I came home from Belgium wishing that, like Belgium Muslims, we had a senator or two and a few congressmen to represent us in the highest corridors of power. But I also came home with greater appreciation for the enormous opportunities we enjoy in the United States and also grateful for the incredibly low levels of discrimination and exclusion that we experience in the United States. Most importantly, I am proud of the vibrant, intellectually alive and traditionally rich Islam that we practice in the United States with no financial favors from the government.

M. A. Muqtedar Khan is assistant professor in the political science and international relations department at University of Delaware. He is also a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution. His Web site is www.ijtihad.org.


Muslim leader urges July 7 inquiry


One of Britain's most senior Muslim leaders has called on Home Secretary Charles Clarke to re-think his decision not to hold a public inquiry into the July 7 atrocities.

Sir Iqbal Sacranie, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said such an inquiry would be "crucial" to establish whether the war in Iraq had been a key factor in prompting the bombings.

Insisting there would be no "cover-up", Mr Clarke said he would instead issue a "narrative" compiled from security services intelligence by a senior civil servant.

Sir Iqbal - knighted by the Queen just two weeks ago - said: "The Muslim working groups set up by Home Office in the aftermath of July 7 said they believed that the Iraq war was a 'key contributory factor' in the radicalisation occurring in some young Muslims.

"A public inquiry would be able to ascertain if this was indeed the case. We believe it is in our country's wider interest to hold a public inquiry and we call on the Government to think again on this crucial matter."

Mr Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Certainly, there is no question of a cover-up of any kind. We are involved in a murder investigation, that is a very active investigation.

"Secondly, we are looking at potential future threats... and that is a very important thing not to be distracted from.

"Thirdly, the time factor. I have always been a sceptic... of the length of time that inquiries of this kind do actually take and the distraction which they offer.

"And finally, of course, a number of committees ... are looking at various aspects of this."

But Mr Clarke said he thought there was a need for a narrative of what happened, adding that legal issues arose because although the bombers were dead, there were still questions over how they operated and whether they acted alone.

Germany sees rise in converts to Islam

BERLIN, Dec 13: More than 1,000 people converted to Islam in Germany this year, the highest figure on record, and a majority were women who were not married to a Muslim, according to a study released on Tuesday.

“This is a considerable rise,” Salim Abdullah, the director of the Central Institute of Islamic Archives in Germany, told the Berliner Zeitung newspaper.

The Institute said its statistics showed that 14,352 of the 3.2 million Muslims in Germany are of German descent.

More than 60 per cent of the converts to Muslim are women and most of them are ‘university-educated and affluent’, Mr Abdullah said.

Only a small percentage converted to Islam as a result of marrying a Muslim.

The institute collates information supplied by local Muslim groups, based on applications for visas for Haj. —AFP

Sunday, December 04, 2005

THE NEXT HOLOCAUST

Ziauddin Sardar5th December 2005 http://www.newstatesman.com/200512050006 Islamophobia is not a uniquely British disease: acrossEurope, liberals openly express prejudice againstMuslims. Do new pogroms beckon? Ziauddin Sardarreports from Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium andFrance.It's a bitterly cold night and the centre of Dortmundis deserted. On weekdays, says our taxi driver,everything closes by ten o'clock. It is not easy tofind a place to eat. Eventually, he drops us at theCava restaurant in Lindemannstrabe. Just one couplepunctuate the ultra-chic of this postmodern bistro. Wesit near them and order our food. Dortmund, Germany isthe first port of call on my journey through theindustrial heartland of northern Europe. After theterrorist attacks in London and the riots in theFrench suburbs, I want to assess the racial divide,the fear and the loathing that permeate so much of ourEuropean continent. Christoph Simmons is an insurance broker in hisforties; his girlfriend, Baneta Lisiecka, is a Polishimmigrant. They invite us to join them for a night outin their "green metropolis". We drive in Christoph'ssports car to Limette, "the only pub in Dortmund opentill 6am". Dortmund is a multicultural city integratedinto the global economy, explains Christoph; thisformer mining town is now a thriving base forhigh-tech research. "Our immigrant communities arewell integrated," he says. Greeks, Italians,Spaniards, Poles live in proverbial perfect harmonywith Germans. There is only one problem: the Turks -"they don't integrate". Baneta thinks they are "mostlycriminals" and she is afraid of them. Christoph alsosays: "They are conservative; their women cover theirheads. The Koran tells them to murder Christians." Hashe ever met a Turk, I ask. "No," he says. "They sticktogether and never come into our pubs." I talk toother people in Limette. Jasmine, a Catholic fromCorsica, sums up the overall feeling. "I don't likeTurks. I don't know why. I just don't like them." And yet I discover that these open manifestations ofracism do not seem to be reciprocated by German Turks.At the Orhan Narghile Grill Cafe, in the Turkish partof Dortmund, I meet Suniye Ozdemir, a single motherborn in Germany. "I don't know," she says with genuineamazement, "why the Germans hate us so much. I don'tknow why they are scared of the Turkish people. Maybethey're jealous. May-be they're afraid we will stealtheir jobs." She introduces me to a group of girlsfrom the Helmholtz Grammar School. Aged between 16 and18, these girls are confident and articulate, and theyspeak good English. They want to become professionalsand to succeed. Gulsum, who wears a hijab, says theyexperience racism every day - at school from theirteachers, on the bus, on the streets. Her friend, whodoes not wear a hijab, says: "We were born in Germanyand we are Germans. We stick together for protection,to avoid hostility." Throughout my journey, from Germany to theNetherlands, onwards to Belgium and finally intoFrance - the object of much recent attention - I meetpeople all too ready to describe Muslims in thecolours of darkness. Islamophobia is not a Britishdisease: it is a common, if diverse, Europeanphenomenon. It is the singular rock against which thetide of European liberalism crashes. There are common themes but also subtle differences inthe way each nation's history influences its people'spresent attitude to immigrant communities. Much ofthis is rooted in the various colonial histories.Germany came late to nationalism and colonialism, andcaught a bad case of both. In the 1880s it scrambledbriefly and brutally for colonies to prove itsimportance as a nation. The roots of its ethnicproblems lie deeper, however, in its history andcultural psyche. Many of the erstwhile principalitiesand tiny statelets that formed Germany were part ofCharlemagne's Holy Roman Empire, a unity forged undersiege and in reaction to the perceived threat ofMuslim civilisation. The Germans embraced the Crusadeswith great vigour: the first, infamously, commenced athome with pogroms against the Jews. The crusadingmotif is as important to the German self-image as itever was; the hatred of Turks I heard was oftenexpressed in crusading language - even if couched inliberal terms. Germany's present ethnic-minority population is thelegacy of its wartime military alliance with Turkey.Under the gastarbeiter ("guest worker") policy, theTurks were good enough to be imported en masse torebuild war-torn Germany but not good enough to begiven German nationality. They existed outside theambit of German identity. It was the continuation ofracial purity in another form. Now that they areissued with national identity cards, now that Germanyhas liberalised, is the concept of what it is to beGerman, I wondered, still a matter of ein Volk - onepeople, the Nazi notion of racial purity? "I am afraid it is," says Wolfram Richter, professorof economics at the University of Dortmund. There aremany factors why the Turks are hated, Richter says. Hecites social factors such as Turks shopping only inTurkish shops, cultural factors such as their womencovering themselves, language problems such as theolder generation of Turks still not speaking German.They are seen as disloyal. Then there is the "Anatoliabride syndrome": German Turks tend to go back toAnatolia to get married and bring their wives toGermany. But the overall factor in the fear andloathing of Turks, Richter says, is old-fashionedracism. "I am afraid we have not learned from ourhistory. My main fear is that what we did to Jews wemay now do to Muslims. The next holocaust would beagainst Muslims." Across the border into the Netherlands and toEindhoven, a lively cultural city with a youngpopulation, where fear of Muslims is equally evident.There are fewer than 5,000 Muslims in Eindhoven andthey are all hidden away in the Woensel district. Buttry to get a taxi driver to take you there. Kim dePeuyssenaece, our driver, is adamant: "It's adangerous area where you could get killed," she says.She has a Moroccan boyfriend, whose picture shedisplays on her mobile phone, yet she dismissesMoroccans as "mostly criminals" who are "ruining ourcountry". She drops us in front of a Moroccan bar nextto the new, clinically structured red-light district,a kind of John Lewis-meets-porn. Inside the Safrak Barand Cafe, the atmosphere is thick with smoke. Old mensit playing backgammon, chequers and dominoes. "We arenot part of the Dutch community," says the bar owner,a tall, aggressive Moroccan who does not want to givehis name. "They don't treat us with respect anddignity. They think we're separate. So we areseparate." That the Dutch see Muslims as a separate community isnot all that surprising. Holland has a brutal colonialhistory just as long as Britain's, and the jewel inits crown was the most populous Muslim nation onearth: Indonesia. The Islamist insurgency in Aceh is alegacy of the people's long war with the Dutch, a warthe colonisers never won and never ended. Slavery andcompulsory labour on Dutch plantations underpinned astrict system of separating the rulers from those theyruled. The Dutch were interested in categorising andneatly arranging the Otherness of those they ruled,the better to maintain their separateness anddependence. Colonial policy now reverberates at home. In another part of Eindhoven we meet Jamal Tushi, anIT consultant in his thirties. "They treat us likecolonial subjects," he says. "For them, all Muslimsare terrorists." Tushi was born and bred in Eindhovenand speaks perfect Dutch, yet finds it hard to getwork. "If you are a young Moroccan, forget the idea ofgetting a job," he says. During job interviews, themuch-acclaimed Dutch liberalism evaporates. "They wantto know what kind of Muslim you are. Do you pray? Doyou go to the mosque?" Dutch liberalism was meant only for the Dutch. Todayit extends to prostitution and drugs, but not toMuslim immigrants. It's like the "ethical policy"Holland developed for its colonies. The policy wasabout Dutch superiority; it had little to do with thereality of life for the people they ruled, and madelittle difference to their condition. The coloniesserved the metropolis, regardless of how they werespoken of and discussed. The language of ethics wasalways about the colonising "Us" and not the colonised"Them", just as all discussion about multiculturalismin Holland is at base about what kind of country "We"are, now that we have let "Them" in. Inclusion, thenor now, was not the point. Dutch liberalism is abouthow good and open "We" are - not an open negotiationabout what liberalism means to and for minoritycommunities. We take the train to Antwerp. Belgium is aninteresting case of multiculturalism, split as it isbetween the Dutch/Flemish-speaking Flemings andFrench-speaking Walloons. There is also a religiousdivide, between Catholics and Protestants. In 1994 arevised constitution introduced devolution in anattempt to tackle the long-standing division betweenthe communities, recognising three provinces andlanguage groups. However, dealing with its ownfractures of multiculturalism does not mean opening upto immigrant minority communities. In downtown Antwerp we come across Noor Huda and herfriend Fatimah Zanuti. Huda, in her early twenties, isa medical technician at a hospital in the city."Multiculturalism in Belgium is meant for theBelgians," she says. "We are not considered Belgian."Huda was born in Antwerp, as were her parents. "Butbeing a third-generation Belgian is not relevant. Weare still colonial subjects." Racism and hatred ofMuslims are so endemic in Belgium, she says, that "youhave to constantly guard what you say. We are alwaysafraid to speak our mind. You do not have the right tosay what you want to say." The barriers in Belgium, as elsewhere in Europe, areborn of colonial history and attitudes. And Belgiumhas one of the most vicious and inhuman of allcolonial histories. Conrad's Heart of Darkness and itspicture of Kurtz in his stockade surrounded by severedheads is based on reality, not the allegory ormetaphor of fiction. In Belgian colonies such as theCongo, the natives were a problem - and the problemwas that they were not working hard enough, notproducing enough rubber for the metropolis. So armedpolice would invade villages, round up women andchildren, imprison them, and murder groups of themuntil the required amount of rubber had been deliveredby the men. Armed police are much in evidence at the policestation in Lange Nieuwstraat. An officer wastes notime in pointing out that Muslims are a problem. "It'sa one-way street," he says. "We are waiting for themto come towards us the way they should and we wantthem to." But should you not also be moving towardsthem, I ask. "No," he replies without hesitation. "Weare not a problem. Islam is the problem. Anything ispossible where Islam is concerned." He expects a riotto take place, sooner or later. A riot, or rather a series of riots, did take place inLille, the last stop on our journey. A northernindustrial town in France, Lille experienced some ofthe worst of the recent unrest. Emmanuel Peronne, afashion designer from the suburb of Roubaix, has nodoubt what caused the riots. "It's economic injusticeand inequalities that successive generations ofMoroccan and Algerian Muslims have suffered inemployment, housing and educational opportunities, aswell as downright racism at the hands of Frenchsociety," he says. "They have no means to survive. Itis all about survival." Roubaix, scene of the mostviolent uprising, is a dilapidated holding area. "Theycall us immigres," says an angry halal butcher. "Butwe were born here. We have no standing in the idealsof 'liberte, egalite, fraternite'." Indeed. The ethos of the French revolution was nevermeant to be pluralistic. Its essential proposition wasbased on totalitarian uniformity - the scourge itunleashed as the ideological underpinning of modernityand European nationalism. It was also the bedrock ofFrench colonialism, which created parallel universes:the superior French and the inferior others.Assimilation into Frenchness and indirect rule overdifference were the twin tracks of French colonialism.So, officially, because France recognises onlyFrenchness, it claims to be colour-blind andnon-racist, yet it is both highly racist and attunedto a colour bar. In Lille as much as in Paris and elsewhere in France,there is a neat parallel that demonstrates thecontinuity of the colonial ethic. In North Africa,where most of the French immigrants come from, themedinas, ancient cities with a Muslim culture, wereencircled in their separateness. The medinas were seenas chaotic, confused and not fit for modernity - thephysical representation of what the French thought ofthe medinas' inhabitants and their culture. Aroundthese old indigestible cores were built modern citieson the French model, where the colonisers lived andfrom which they dominated. Today, Lille has its owntraditional core, a bounded city whose limits arejealously guarded. Around this inviolate core circlethe depressing banlieues: modern slums of the grey,inhospitable and inhuman hutches built to house theindigestible population of migrant workers. Therationale of the colony is neatly reversed and broughthome to the metropolis. It is a metaphor for all thathas not changed. Throughout our journey, we were surprised at howopenly prejudiced people were against Muslims. Eachcountry has its own extreme-right party, led byfigures such as Jean-Marie Le Pen in France or PimFortuyn, who was assassinated in Holland in 2002. InBelgium, the draconian right is represented by theVlaams Blok, a Flemish nationalist party founded in1977. Philippe Van der Sande, its spokesman inAntwerp, declares that "immigrants do not adapt. Theydon't want to learn the language. They are notinterested in our culture but just winning easymoney." Well, we would expect him to say that. Yet thepeople we spoke to were ordinary citizens who sawthemselves as liberals and enlightened individuals. European liberalism today may be a consequence ofdecolo-nisation. But it seems more like a denial ofuncomfortable, unanalysed traits than a genuineovercoming of the past. Europe is post-colonial butambivalent. Even among individuals with more relaxedattitudes to interracial relationships, racism isunashamed and upfront. In practice, now as in thepast, such relationships make little differencebecause they require subordination of the partner whois from an ethnic minority. Indeed, they can work toincrease the sense of superiority and separation. Itmeans less emphasis on race, but more on culture asthe quintessential dividing line. Everywhere I went, the thought that the nation mightchange in the process of accommodating its minoritieswas conspicuous by its absence. Minorities are fine asmenial workers, a subordinate class. It is whenminorities seek to be upwardly mobile, to live themodern liberal dispensation in their own, distinctiveway as self-assured, equal members of the nationaldebate - and that was the desire of all the youngMuslims I met - that the problems start and latentprejudice comes to the fore. The central mosque in Lille is located in the Wazemmesarea. It is a rather unremarkable structure: threehouses seem to have been knocked together and a dwarfdome and minaret added rather crudely. The mosque alsoserves as the first Muslim school in France. It isnamed after Averroes, the great 12th-century Spanishrationalist philosopher and humanist. It is a pitythat Europe appropriated his rationalism, butjettisoned his pluralistic humanism. Ibn Rushd, to usehis Muslim name, would demand that the establishedorder that calls itself honourable and ethical,liberal and tolerant, offer an appropriate explanationto those whom it continues to discriminate against,dehumanise and demean.

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Blair denies bombing plot knowledge
Tuesday 29 November 2005, 3:39 Makka Time, 0:39 GMT

Related:
Aljazeera demands answers from Blair
US,UK asked to explain Jazeera memo
Aljazeera probes Bush 'bombing' memo

British Prime Minister Tony Blair has denied receiving any details of a reported US proposal to bomb Aljazeera.
The Daily Mirror newspaper reported last week that a secret British government memo said Blair had talked US President George Bush out of bombing the Arab broadcaster's Doha headquarters in April 2004.
The White House has dismissed the report as "outlandish", while Blair's office has so far refused to comment.
Blair was asked in a written question to parliament made public on Monday "what information he received on action that the United States administration proposed to take against the Aljazeera television channel?"
In a written response, Blair gave the one-word answer "none".
The question, published on the parliament website, was proposed for discussion by lawmaker Adam Price, of the Welsh party Plaid Cymru.
A spokeswoman for Blair's Downing Street office made no further comment on the prime minister's response.
Aljazeera's quest
At a London news conference late on Monday, Daily Mirror's associate editor Kevin Maguire said he did not believe the reported threat against Aljazeera was a joke.
Aljazeera chief Waddah Khanfarwants an explanation from Blair"It is clear from the language used in the memo and its context that Tony Blair took it seriously and counselled against it. It certainly wasn't a joke," he said.
The paper quoted an unnamed government official as suggesting Bush's threat was a joke, but had another unidentified source saying the US president was serious.
Aljazeera's general manager Waddah Khanfar, who flew to London last week to seek an explanation about the memo, said he was unsure what to believe, but Aljazeera would not abandon the story until it got an answer.
"I want not to believe it," he said.
Britain's attorney-general has warned other media that they can be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act if they reveal further details of the memo.
Britain is prosecuting a civil servant and a parliamentarian's aide for leaking the secret document.
The Mirror's report was picked up by the world's media and prompted Aljazeera to demand clarification from the US and Britain.

Monday, November 28, 2005

IUML demands Neli probe report

GUWAHATI, Nov 27: Assam unit of the Indian Union of Muslim League (IUML) has demanded immediate release of the report of the Tiwari Commission which probed into the Neli carnage that had taken place in 1983. A resolution in this regard was adopted in the executive meeting of the party here today, said MU Mandal, general secretary of Assam IUML, while talking to some journalist here
The party would contest 45 constituencies in the forthcoming Assembly elections in the State, he said. National president of the party, GM Banatwala and its general secretary and Minister of State for External Affairs E Ahmed were scheduled to arrive in Guwahati to asses the party’s organizational status in the first week of December, he added. The party has also decided to hold conventions in district level from December 1 to strengthen its organizational base among the masses.

Saturday, November 26, 2005


“The 21st century Nazis”


Following up developments in Iraq under the occupation, you all must be familiar with a term that has repeatedly appeared on news reports during the past two years: The Triangle of Death, the area south of the Iraqi capital, which constitutes the three towns of Yosfiya, Mahmoodiya and Latifiya, stated an editorial by Sabah Ali from Brussels Tribunal.

Contrary to how this area; The Triangle of Death or the Death Triangle has been portrayed in mainstream media, it has nothing to do with death- It is located in one of the greenest, most beautiful and peaceful areas of Iraq, with fruit orchards,vegetable farms where the Tigris and the Euphrates and the rural areas that engulf hundreds of small villages. The Area south of Baghdad used to be one of the most important industrial areas in the war torn country,but it is now branded Triangle of Death by the occupying government, Washington, due to the hideous amount of attacks the three countries witnessed since the war was launched in March 2003.
The region, inhabited by a mixture of Shia and Sunni tribes, as almost everywhere else in Iraq, has become a death zone for many Iraqis, including members of the security services, the invading troops, and other workers including members of humanitarian organisations.


Before the occupation the region never witnessed any sectarian tensions whatsoever. But since the invading forces arrived in the country, massive military operations were regularly took place there, as well as horrible stories of arrests, torture, and mass killing, not only by the American troops, but also by the Iraqi police and Army units.

Yosfiya, which lies almost 30 kilometers south of the Iraqi capital, houses the American military base, and prison where all Iraqi detainees are usually kept, to be moved later into bigger prisons like Abu Ghraib or Camp Bucca in Um Qasr (near Basra).

The writer described mountains of garbage thrown on both sides of the highway. Beyond that is the car graveyard, where destroyed vehicles are gathered to be sold for the cheapest price.

The way to Yosfiya, which used to take 15 minutes, takes now at least 1.30 hour.
“The driver said it was impossible to reach Qaraghool village as it is now besieged by the Iraqi and American troops for 3 months”.

"This is the point", we objected, "We want to see how the villagers are surviving there"

"Not today please, trust me you cannot go today" he said.

“Our first stop was Nasser Shneiter village, on the eastern side. This is no more than 14 houses of farmers from one family: Nasser, a Shia family from Beni Saad tribe. On the dusty side way, a deserted house was destroyed, the walls split, the windows smashed, the okras left to dry un plucked, so are the cotton trees. The driver explained that the house was raided, bombed by sound bombs, two men were arrested, one of them, Nektal Rahman Adaay was killed during the arrest. The families, 12, are now living with relatives”.

Nothing could be seen or heard except dogs’ barking.

The Iraqi police Special Forces, Al-Hussein Brigades, came at dawn, in some 20 pick ups- They were hit from a place behind the Yosfiya Water Project. Tens of them were killed and their cars were burnt in a battle that went on for 3 hours.

Same day, more forces, accompanied by the American troops and helicopters, raided the houses, killed and arrested the men, humiliated the families, killed the cows and chicken, destroyed the yards, and set the village on fire.

"They dragged one of the men Abbass Oeid, more than 70 years, and beat him to death. Two other man, were arrested,
Karim Motar, 50, and Riyadh Talab Jabr, 20. Their bodies were found three days later in Baghdad. They put police uniform on Karim’s body. Riyadh was naked. Both were savagely tortured, their bones, backs, and arms were smashed".

"They believed that the village was colluding with the resistance".

But Ali Nasser, another man from the village, denies the allegations.

"Some of them were not killed, they managed to run away, they can testify about what happened, actually they hid in our houses and fought from there, we gave them protection, some families served them tea and bread. They say that
the Sunnis are fighting them, we are Shia, so why they burnt our village?"

"I do not know, that is why I ask the government to come here and investigate. We have done nothing wrong, never hurt any body or broken any law. We were punished for a crime that we did not do. We were in the middle of the fire, this is our only fault"

"I want the government to hear my question and answer me: why were we treated like this? The police brigades broke even the electricity converters, we do not have power for 40 days, of course water pumps do not operate and the plants are all dead. Our animals were killed, our women humiliated."

"They ask the women where did you hide the men, they grabbed the children from their hair and throw them to the ground. Riyadh’s mother was crying and begging them to leave her son; they hit her with the gun’s end, they smashed his head with a brick in front of her eyes, now she is dying. When his body was found it was skinned… Abbass was so told that he could not even walk how he would be a terrorist!! He was beaten to death on the spot and his body was thrown in the drainage. When they searched the houses they did not find any indication that any of them had any thing to do with terrorism or weapons, so why? The government is working on turning every body against it. It is encouraging ordinary people to resist by treating them so savagely. They have no mercy. We have nothing left now, nothing."

Ali went to the police to complain. But the police accused the villagers of slaughtering the policemen.

-"I tried to save something, but I could not, they would not let me. They came in four helicopters and surrounded the whole area. They put the gun on my head and asked where the Mujahedeen are. They destroyed everything, even my medicines. They said you help the Mujahedeen with those medicines, and destroyed them. Troops from the police Scorpion brigade were hit in the area the day before, and they believed that we knew about the Mujahedeen ".

Washington’s response to the justified uprising against the illegal occupation in Iraq has been to unleash a wave of bloody operations, with helicopter gunships, jets, tanks and heavily armed soldiers inside the and outside the so-called Death Triangle, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women and children- Homes, factories and mosques have been destroyed by the merciless occupation.

Some defend Bush’s admin against accusations that it’s been acting as a fascist regime- But numerous analysts have unveiled Washington’s attempt to seize control of the Iraqi oil and implement its long-term agenda of redrawing the Middle East map in a way that serves the American and probably the Israeli interests in the region, and which America believes and had made clear in many occasions it won’t be sustained except through military “terror”, according to World Socialist Web Site.

As resistance to the invading troops intensifies and grows bolder, the occupying power responds with ever-greater violence and bloodshed- Washington has already started using methods the Nazis used to suppress the resistance movements in occupied Europe during World War II.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

French Unrest Sends Shockwaves Across Europe
November 8, 2005 – The seemingly unabating unrest across France has sent shockwaves across Europe, with similar, though limited, incidents reported in several European countries.
Hundreds of Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants took to the streets of Amsterdam on Monday, November 7, to protest their deteriorating living conditions.
The protestors called on the Dutch government to change its policy towards immigrants, both legal or illegal.
The French government declared Tuesday a state of emergency in riot-hit parts in order to combat the worst outbreak of urban unrest since the May 1968 student revolt.
Nearly two weeks of rioting in the country's high-immigration suburbs has left more than 6,000 cars burned, public and private property destroyed, tens of policemen injured and one civilian death.
The deaths 10 days ago of two youths fleeing police ignited pent up frustrations among young men, many of them of North and black African origin, at racism, unemployment, their marginal place in French society and their treatment by the police.
Prodi has warned that an explosion of urban violence in Italy was "only a matter of time" as "we have the worst suburbs in Europe."
Security agencies across Belgium have been placed on high alert after Molotov cocktail were thrown Monday at two police cars in a Brussels district.
Also Monday, a police car in downtown Brussels was also put afire.
In another Brussels suburb, policemen exchanged fire with immigrants after security men tried to force a young immigrant to wash a car he had urinated.
Police forces were unusually heavily deployed in Brussels and high-immigration suburbs as a precautionary measure.
Many policemen have cancelled their weekly vacations and reported to their stations in anticipation of any emergencies.
Belgians fear a potential spillover of the French unrest into their country.
Yet, a provincial interior minister ruled out a repeat of the French scenario in Belgium, arguing that living standards were far better than those in France.
He advised the French to provide career opportunities for the young immigrants to bring riots to a peaceful end and achieve integration.
Many politicians and observers across Europe warned that the French unrest was a wakeup call for their own countries.
"France is not alone", Trevor Phillips, head of Britain's Commission for Racial Equality, wrote in The Observer newspaper.
"Everywhere, smugness about the state of race relations is being punctured," he said.
A prominent French anti-globalization activist blamed the worsening urban unrest on failed government's integration policies as well as the social and economic marginalization of immigrants.
"Riots have nothing to do with Muslims, Arabs or African immigrants as propagated by the media," Jose Bove said.
"The unrest has its roots in decade-old failed social policies to improve the situation in France's poor suburbs."
The government declared Tuesday a state of emergency in riot-hit parts in order to combat the worst outbreak of urban unrest since the May 1968 student revolt.
Meeting in crisis session under the chairmanship of President Jacques Chirac, the cabinet invoked a 50 year-old law originally drawn up at the start of the Algerian war which permits the declaration of curfews, house-searches and a ban on public meetings.
The measure will come into effect at midnight after the government has issued a decree setting out the geographical limits for the state of emergency.
Nearly two weeks of rioting in the country's high-immigration suburbs has left more than 6,000 cars burned, public and private property destroyed, tens of policemen injured and one civilian death.
More than 1,500 people -- mainly Arab and black youngsters -- have been detained.
The deaths 10 days ago of two youths fleeing police ignited pent up frustrations among young men, many of them of North and black African origin, at racism, unemployment, their marginal place in French society and their treatment by the police.
Bove, a farmer and unionist, blamed the unrest on social and economic marginalization of the African and Muslim immigrants in the European country.
"There will be no solution to the crisis in the near future unless the government changes its policies toward marginalized immigrants," he added.
The activist urged the French parliament to debate the root causes of crisis, describing the unrest as "a revolution by desperate youths who have lost all hopes."
Muslim thinker Tareq Ramadan blamed the entire political class in France for the riots, saying the political class has been "blind" to what has been happening in the suburbs, with their unemployed youth of Arab and African origin and bleak high-rises.
Bove also asked Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy to apologize for his anti-immigrant remarks.
The interior minister has been under fire for his "zero-tolerance" policy, which caused violence in the areas.
The French Communist Party, the Greens and the Socialist Party have joined forces, demanding the sacking of Sarkozy over his handling of the crisis.
He has been accused of stoking passions by calling troublemakers "racaille" or rabble, and saying that crime-ridden areas need to be "cleaned with a power-hose."
"Our French neighbors are giving us the loudest alarm call they can. Wake up, everybody."
Italy's main opposition leader Romano Prodi warned over the weekend that an explosion of urban violence in Italy was "only a matter of time" as "we have the worst suburbs in Europe."
Prodi, a former European Commission president, said: "Our suburbs are a human tragedy, and if we don't take serious action on social and housing issues we will have many scenes like Paris."
Bremen-based sociologist Lorenz Boellinger fears violence could flare up quickly in Germany.
"There is already an explosive mix which could lead to riots," he told Agence France-Presse
Boellinger called on German authorities to provide more help for immigrant families by giving them advice on life in Germany and setting up youth centers and youth clubs in immigrant areas.
Late Sunday, five cars were set ablaze in Berlin and six in the western city of Bremen.

Sunday, October 23, 2005

More than 53 million Muslims in Europe

Posted: October 22, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern


By Wolfgang Polzer
© 2005 ASSIST News Service

WETZLAR, Germany – More than 53 million Muslims live in Europe – 14 million of them in the European Union, according to newly released figures.

The Central Institute's Islam Archives in Soest, Germany, says the number of Muslims in Europe has increased by 800,000 over the last two years, reports the German evangelical news agency IDEA.


The institute’s director, Salim Abdullah, says that among the 25 EU states, France has the highest number of Muslims – 5.5 million – followed by Germany with 3.2 million, the United Kingdom with 1.5 million and Italy with 1 million.

Taking into account the whole continent, Russia has 25 million Muslims and the European part of Turkey 5.9 million. The Muslim population in Germany is mostly made up of Turkish migrants. But the number of Muslims holding a German passport has risen to almost 1 million.

Muslim worship in Germany is on the rise. Approximately 200,000 take part in daily prayers and 493,000 in Friday prayers at mosques and prayer houses – an increase of more than 10 percent over last year’s figures.

Islam in Germany is a "young religion," according to the institute, which counts 850,000 Muslims as minors. One in five Muslim adolescents worships regularly.

The number of converts to Islam has reached a new high in Germany. According to the institute, more than 1,100 people changed their religion to Islam between 2004 and 2005. Approximately 60 percent of the converts were women. Most converted because they married a Muslim.

But the reverse also is true: More and more Muslims in Germany are becoming Christians. Most are Iranians in exile, who left their country after the Islamic revolution of 1979. Iranian converts estimate that each year approximately 60 Muslims are baptized in Germany.

The institute believes that more than 100,000 Iranian Shiites have converted to the Christian faith since the Islamic revolution. Most live in the United States.

Russian Leader Blames Unrest on Repressing Islam

MOSCOW, October 17, 2005 (IslamOnline.net & News
Agencies) – The new leader of a Russian province
rocked by recent bloody attacks warned Monday, October
17, that religious repression was partly to blame for
the crisis in the country, promising that he will
reach out to Muslims.

"You can't solve these problems just through
prohibition," Agence France-Presse (AFP) quoted Arsen
Kanokov as telling the Kommersant daily in an
interview.

The recently-appointed president of the
Kabardino-Balkaria province was speaking a week after
more than 60 people were killed in simultaneous
attacks claimed by Chechen fighters on government
buildings in the southern Russian city of Nalchik.

Kanokov also highlighted that the closure of mosques
and abuses by law-enforcement bodies as reasons for
the ‘radicalization’ of local Muslims in the lead up
to last week's violence.

"Law-enforcement bodies did indeed commit certain
excesses. I consider that closing mosques was not
right. You cannot close mosques and push people into
one place," he said, referring to the sole,
government-controlled mosque left in Nalchik.

"Banning them from praying, forcing them into cellars
and hiding places, where it is harder to control them,
will only be worse. There has been, in my view, a
certain deviation which we will correct."

Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered sealing
off the city and issued shoot-to-kill orders for any
person who puts up armed resistance to security
forces.

Nalchik is located some 150km west of the Chechen
capital Grozny.

Closer

Kanokov, whom the Kremlin named in September to roll
back endemic corruption, economic collapse and a
growing Islamic insurgency in the province, said the
government must be closer to the people if it is to
win their trust.

"If people see that (the authorities) feel their
concerns, worry about them, then they will look
differently on the authorities. If we shut ourselves
from the population, from its problems, then people
feel this at once."

He said economic development would be the key to
keeping unemployed youths from falling under the
influence of ‘well-financed radical groups’.

"There is very high unemployment and a very low living
standard. The economy practically has not functioned,
people had nothing to do, and that means the mass of
young people.

"Of course it is very easy to bring them under the
wrong influence, especially with finances," he said.

Kanokov said he would discuss in Moscow the
possibility of allowing the relatives of gunmen killed
during the fighting in Nalchik to retrieve their
bodies.

Under anti-terrorism laws, the bodies of fighters and
others killed in armed clashes are buried secretly on
prison territory.

Kanokov said he would probably be against making an
exception in this case, but "on the other hand, it
would certainly be a tension-reducing act."

A statement posted on an Internet Web site used
regularly by Chechen fighters said the Nalchik attack
was mounted by a unit of the Caucasus Front of the
Armed Forces of the Chechen Ishkeria Republic.

Interfax quoted an official as saying that the attacks
were in reprisal for the recent arrest in Nalchik of a
group of Islamists, whom the gunmen were attempting to
free.

The Yarmak unit was the target of a swoop by security
forces in January.

The Nalchik attack was the latest in a series by
Chechen fighters on Russian federal security
installations in the volatile North Caucasus region.

The small mountainous Caucasus republic has been
ravaged by conflict since 1994, with just three years
of relative peace after the first Russian invasion of
the region ended in August 1996 and the second began
in October 1999.

It was on December 11, 1994 that former Russian
president Boris Yeltsin ordered Russian troops into
Chechnya to subdue an increasingly powerful separatist
movement.

After two years of horrific fighting, Russian troops
pulled out in 1996.

In 1999, then-prime minister Vladimir Putin pushed
some 80,000 Russian troops into Chechnya in what
Moscow called a lightning-strike “anti-terror
operation” but which has since degenerated into a
grinding war with Chechen fighters.

At least 100,000 Chechen civilians and 10,000 Russian
troops are estimated to have been killed in both
invasions, but human rights groups have said the real
numbers could be much higher.

Thousands of refugees from war-torn Chechnya live in
battered tent camps in neighboring Ingushetia and
refuse to return home because of continuing
insecurity.

Muslims Celebrate 50 Years in Korea

It was half a century ago that two Muslims, Imam
Zubercoch and Abdul Rahman, fought for peace in the
Korean War as part of the UN forces and in the process
introduced Islam's holy book, the Koran, to Korea. On
Friday, the country celebrated the golden anniversary
of their mission.

Sponsored by the Korea-Middle East Association,
prominent figures in Korea's Islamic community along
with foreign dignitaries and Korean lawmakers gathered
to commemorate the anniversary.

Muslims came together to say evening prayers before
breaking their fast during the holy month Ramadan with
the “iftar” meal. Though such observances seem alien
to many, Islam is said to be the fastest growing
religion on earth and followed by one-fifth of the
world population.

Korea now has some 100,000 Muslims, more than 30
percent of whom are Koreans. That Islamic
fundamentalists were behind major terrorist acts
worldwide has meant that many ordinary Muslims face
discrimination. But religious leaders insist Islam is
a peaceful faith.

"It's a shame that many Koreans associate Islam with
terrorism. Those terrorists have nothing to do with
our religion. It's wrong to say they are Islamic
fundamentalists, they are just from anti-American or
anti-Israeli groups. Islam's ideologies are peace,
equality and brotherhood," one said.

The Korean government has tried to ensure that not all
Muslims are tarred with the same brush. "We have
established an important forum, the Korea-Middle East
Forum, and we have held two conferences already,” a
government official said. The anniversary “provides a
very important platform and opportunity for people,
academics and journalists to exchange views and
appreciate the history and culture and religions of
Koreans and Muslims."

Korea is putting on exhibitions of Islamic art,
cultural performances and friendly football matches,
film screenings and food festivals to deepen ties
between non-Muslims in Korea and the Islamic world.

Arirang News

Hindu Nationalist - BJP sticking to Hindutva: Laxman

Hyderabad, Oct 22 : The BJP should remove the "public perception" that the party has distanced itself from the "Hindutva" ideology, to restore its glory, said party's former president Bangaru Laxman.

"The BJP will be reduced to a team of the Congress if it gives up Hindutva," he claimed in its sister fanatic organisation Jan Sangh Formation Day celebrations here last night. "The public perception that the party has distanced itself from the core issues of Ayodhya, Uniform Civil Code and abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution providing special status to Jammu and Kashmir, has cost the party dearly," he added.

Monday, October 17, 2005

Skinheads attack Muslim worshippers

SKINHEADS have attacked a Muslim prayer room near Moscow, the Council of Russian muftis said overnight.

Following Friday prayers, 10 youths with shaven heads and brandishing metal objects attacked worshippers in the only Muslim prayer room in the town of Serviev Posad, northeast of Moscow, Mufti council head Radik Amirov said.

"The skinheads beat up the faithful who were present as well as an inter-religious relations officer," who was taken to hospital and required stitches to a wound, Mr Amirov said.

The attackers reportedly yelled "Russia for Russians" and "there is no room for Muslims in Russia".

Mr Amirov denounced the violence and declared himself outraged by threats and similar acts carried out against Russia's Muslim population.

Sergiev Posad is a bastion of the Russian Orthodox church, the main religion in the country.

There are some 20 million Muslims in Russia, equally around one in seven residents.

Friday, October 07, 2005

How the Mossad Decieved the US Military on 911
Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency, infiltrated the most sensitive computer networks in the United States through a little start-up company known as Ptech, in Quincy, Massachusetts.Most notably, it was this infiltration that allowed the events of September 11, 2001 to occur.If the crimes of 9/11 had been properly investigated, these people would have been investigated and booked long ago. The Mossad connection is obvious; read on:In order to facilitate the computer network penetration, Mossad set up a IT consultancy and software provider named Ptech using Lebanese and Arabs as the front-man financiers and founders and keeping their Jewish American "sayan" in a secondary, but critical position.First a note of background on what Ptech did, from the January 2005 article "Michael Chertoff and the sabotage of the Ptech investigation" on the Rigorous Intuition weblog:"Joe Bergantino, a reporter for WBZ-TV's investigative team, was torn. He could risk breaking a story based on months of work investigating a software firm linked to terrorism, or heed the government's demand to hold the story for national security reasons. In mid-June, Bergantino received a tip from a woman in New York who suspected that Ptech, a computer software company in Quincy, Mass., had ties to terrorists. Ptech specialized in developing software that manages information contained in computer networks."Bergantino's investigation revealed that Ptech's clients included many federal governmental agencies, including the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Naval Air Command, Congress, the Department of Energy, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, NATO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service and even the White House."Ptech was doing business with every federal government in defense and had access to key government data," Bergantino said.Source: http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabotage-of-ptech.htmlThe Mossad handler at Ptech was, in my opinon, an American named Michael S. Goff, who is disingenous about what he did, when he worked at, and when he left, Ptech.It should be noted that Ptech "got on its feet in 1994." Goff implies that he left Ptech when Goff Communications began in 1994; certainly not true.Here is what Michael Goff's website says about his work there:Michael was marketing manager at Ptech, Inc., a leading provider of business process modeling, design and development software. In this capacity, Michael managed various marketing programs and activities including public relations, direct mail, Web development, collateral, trade shows and seminars. Additionally, Michael worked closely with the Ptech sales organization to perform competitive analysis as well as manage lead tracking and fulfillment activities.When Michael first joined Ptech, he shared responsibilities between marketing and information systems for the company. As information systems manager, Michael handled design, deployment and management of its Windows and Macintosh, data, and voice networks. As part of this effort, Michael developed Lotus Notes-based systems for sales and marketing lead tracking and IS service and support requests. Michael also performed employee training and handled all procurement for software, systems and peripherals.See: http://www.goffpr.com/about.aspFrom Goff Communications website, you will notice that one of his current prize clients is an Israeli company known as Guardium. Guardium is less than 5 miles from Hanscom AFB, site of MIT's Lincoln Labs and about the same distance from Boston's Logan Airport. The Israelis are all over MIT and Boston.See: http://www.guardium.com/Guardium, a "database security" firm, is clearly a Mossad operation working in a critical area - the same area that the two planes that hit the World Trade Center originated - Boston's Logan Airport.
Three firms, all Israeli, and all manned by Mossad agents. It should be noted that Mossad's headquarters are in Herzeliya. It is clear that the three firms, Cedar Fund, Veritas Venture Partners, and StageOne, are all Mossad funding outfits.So, with Ptech, what we had was an American "sayan" [i.e. Jewish agent who works with the Mossad when necessary], Michael S. Goff, who had Mossad agents feeding him information and directing him WHILE he worked with his Lebanese Muslim "partners" in Ptech.Now why would a young American lawyer working with a good law firm in his home town suddenly leave the practice of law and work with a dodgy start-up software company owned and financed by a Lebanese and a Saudi?
Goff's family is a well-respected an well-known family in Worcester, Mass. He had it made at a good law firm after leaving law school. Why the career change?Mossad asked him to do it. For the good of the Jewish people, etc, etc.Under Goff, Ptech software loaded with trapdoors and Trojan Horses was sold and loaded onto the MOST sensitive computer systems that failed miserably, or performed well (depending on your view), on September 11, 2001.Goff's father and grandfather, Samuel, were accountants who belonged to Worcester's "Commonwealth Lodge 600 of B'nai B'rith", whatever that group does for the American people. They were both 32nd Degree Masons. Does an apple fall far from the tree?IMPORTANT NOTE to the non-corrupted FBI and U.S. Law enforcement agents: If you take a close look at the individuals who are running Guardium, and those behind the three companies who are financing this outfit, and interrogate them in Guantanamo for a few weeks, we will get to the bottom of who pulled of 9/11. I guarantee it.

Thursday, October 06, 2005

Muslim groups in Assam vow to vote out Congress


Web posted at: 10/4/2005 8:56:9
Source ::: IANS
Badruddeen Ajmal, Jamiat Ulama-E-Hind President, being felicitated by his supporters after being elected President of the newly floated party United Democratic Front by more than 20 minority organisations of Assam, in Guwahati, yesterday.

Guwahati: Muslim groups in Assam Monday formed a new political party with a pledge to oust the ruling Congress from power in the upcoming assembly elections.

At least 12 prominent Muslim organisations, led by the Assam chapter of Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind, formed the United Democratic Front (UDF) at a political convention in Assam's main city Guwahati.

"We shall see to it that the Congress party and its Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi are taught a lesson during the elections. We shall give the Congress a run for its money in the polls," Maulana Arshad Madani, vice president of All India Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind, told the convention.

Muslims in Assam, who account for about 30 percent of the state's 26 million people, have for decades been at the centre stage of electoral politics as the community holds the key in at least 40 of the 126 assembly constituencies.

The Muslims and Bengali speaking linguistic minority voters in Assam have traditionally been Congress supporters.

"It is indeed a sad day for us as we are speaking against the Congress party with whom we share a strong bond for more than a century now. But we cannot remain silent as the Congress government led by Gogoi is working against the interests of the minorities," Madani said.

The decision to form a political party by the minority groups came in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in July to repeal the controversial Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, which was applicable only in Assam.

The 22-year-old act was replaced with the Foreigners Act of 1946.

"We shall mobilise all our resources throughout the state to ensure the defeat of the Congress," Badruddin Azmal, president of the UDF, said.

"The Congress betrayed the interests of the minorities by not defending the IMDT act in the Supreme Court the way it should have been done."

Assam goes to the polls early next year.

The UDF is yet to announce if it would forge an electoral alliance with other political parties.

"We are having negotiations with secular parties although nothing is finalised as yet," UDF leader Hafiz Rashid Ahmed Choudhury said.

According to indications, the UDF might come to some electoral understanding with the regional Asom Gana Parishad (AGP).

The formation of the UDF could alter political equations in Assam ahead of the elections, with the Congress likely to be at the receiving end.

Chief Minister Gogoi recently said his party would win the polls without the support of the Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind, whose leaders had campaigned for the Congress in past elections.

Sunday, October 02, 2005

India's shameful vote against Iran
By Ghulam Muhammed 2/10/2005
India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will have to take full responsibility for blackening his country’s face in front of the whole non-aligned world, over his government’s most perfidious about-turn in succumbing to the US pressure of open and blatant blackmail and voting against Iran in International Atomic Energy Agency’s September 24 meeting at Vienna.India’s vote, even an abstaining one, would have been almost a symbol of defiance by the rest of the world to America’s relentless aggressive planning to invade and take over weak and indefensible countries in the third world by sheer use of its armed might. India has paved the way for America, UK and Israel, to repeat their nefarious aggression once again in the Middle East.Whatever be technicalities involved in the matter, Manmohan Singh cannot doubt America’s well publicized threat to Iran’s sovereignty and thus he cannot escape the blame that he has used his office to go against the universal consensus of Indian people and even its political parties, including CPI (M) and BJP, against siding with the US, in its evil plans against a weak and indefensible country and that too in its very immediate neighborhood. Manmohan has bright war at the doorstep of India.By this single act, India has fully registered its membership in the infamous colonial ‘axis of evil’ that the neo-con power-mongers have been gathering to take over the third world. In one stroke, Manmohan Singh has completely repudiated the whole history and ethos of India’s 58 years’ moral leadership of a world solidly aligned against the greed and avarice of the Western colonialists. Iraq is too fresh for Manmohan Singh, not to be drawing the correct conclusions while short-sightedly and tamely submitting to the high-handed dictates of an avaricious predator nation that will have no sympathy even for India, when it gets its upper hand. It is a matter of great importance that except for Indian Express (which earlier was incensed on Natwar Singh using Muslim card; thus exposing its editor’s ugly communal face), practically all mainstream media have instantly revolted against the small cabal of decision makers at the top, that have abused the trust and authority of their offices to commit India to a very hazardous course. Much before India hopes to achieve any economic miracle through liberalization, India will become the burial ground for South Asia’s all economic dreams.The way Manmohan Singh’s misadventure has been vehemently opposed both by the Left as well as the Right, (the coalition partners and the political opposition, both of whom even on ideological grounds are supposed to be against Iranian regime – since this is not merely an Iranian issue), categorically proves that Manmohan Singh has committed a monumental and historical blunder. Either he should retrace the steps or simply resign. It is doubtful if India’s national interest is safe in his hands. It is apparent his commitment to the US and US plans to subjugate other countries is much deeper than people of India would have ever guessed.

Saturday, October 01, 2005

Nagas, and india to resume talks in Bangkok

Sujit Chakraborty October 01, 2005 14:01 IST
A fresh round of peace talks between the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Issac-Muivah) and the federal Group of Ministers is all set to begin in Bangkok, Thailand, in the second week of October.
Disclosing this in an exclusive interview to rediff.com, Mani Charenamei, member of Parliament and a Naga leader from Manipur, said the 'Greater Nagaland' issue will certainly be the top agenda during the discussion.
Muivah: I am not happy with India's response
Charenamei asserted that he was working as a facilitator between the government and the Naga underground outfit, headed by its General Secretary Thuingaleng Muivah and Chairman Issac Chishi Swu.
He also urged different Manipuri underground outfits to form a common platform and resume peace talks with the Centre.
The NSCN (I-M), on the other hand, is operating from South Asian territories since nearly four decades. It had entered into a ceasefire agreement with the government in 1997.
The government, on its part, has extended the ceasefire period for another six months after the earlier ceasefire agreement expired on July 31 this year.
While the NSCN insists on its one-point agenda -- the unification of Naga-inhabited areas of the northeast -- the Group of Ministers argue that since the Nagas were never under one administrative area it was not practical to reunite them, or to redraw the region's boundary.
The NSCN (I-M) and their followers want a 'Greater Nagaland' to be created by slicing off four districts from Manipur, (Chandel, Senapati, Tamenglong and Ukhrul), two from Arunachal Pradesh (Tirap and Changlang), and large parts from Assam, including the areas inhabited by the Karbi tribe.
Why talk with a banned outfit: NSCN
However, a majority of people from the three states have strongly reacted against any such move, as they feel that such an attempt would further disintegrate the region and widen the gap between the Indian mainland and the remote northeast.
Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi along with his counterparts Ibobi Singh and Gegong Apang, from Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh respectively, reiterated, "There can be no compromise on territorial integrity, and we will not accept any formula of sharing even an inch of our land."
Another issue the Group of Ministers is pushing forward is the unification of various Naga factions before arriving at any mutually acceptable formula to end the nearly six-decade-old Naga underground movement.
The NSCN (Khaplang) faction, mainly based in Myanmar, is yet to give its nod to the NSCN (I-M) faction's unification demand. The Khaplang faction has limited influence in the Mon, Tuensang and Makokchung districts of Nagaland.
NSCN general secretary Muivah, a Thangkhul Naga, belongs to Somdel village of Ukhrul district in Manipur. Issac Chishi Swu, the faction's chairman, is a Sema Naga from Dimapur. On the other hand, S S Khaplang is a Naga from Mynamar and his group has a good following among the Konyak, Ao, Sema and other Naga clans. This has been a major roadblock towards the unification of different Naga clans on a single platform.
In fact, Naga society is divided over the leadership issue. Ao and Angami, the two major Naga tribes of Nagaland, are not very keen on having a Thangkhul Naga of Manipur as the supreme Naga leader.
It is an irony that while the NSCN (I-M) insists on achieving a 'Greater Nagalim' by redrawing the northeast boundary, it has so far failed to achieve unity among the different Naga groups.

Friday, September 30, 2005

I was a BNP activist ... and converted to Islam

Muhammad IslamSaturday September 24, 2005The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,2763,1575810,00.html
I hated all foreigners but feared Muslims the most. Igrew up in the 1960s in Gateshead, in a predominantlywhite area; I can't remember seeing an Asian facethere. As a family we were not religious. We only wentto weddings, funerals and christenings. I was notinterested in school, either. You didn't need to stayon because you were more or less guaranteed a job inthe mines, steelworks or shipyards.When I was 16, all my friends were British NationalParty activists. It was a cool thing to do, and Ijoined in, too. I wanted to shock, to rebel. We wouldget together, drink, listen to music, chase girls andgo out Paki-bashing. That wasn't a phrase weconsidered bad or wrong.I remember my first time; it was a Saturday night andwe had been drinking. We went into an Asian area andcame across a lad of about 17. We started chanting -the usual thing, "Go back to your own country" - andthen went after him. There were about 10 of us, and wekicked and punched him. When we ran away, I remember,we were laughing. I don't know what happened to him,and at the time I wouldn't have cared: I was in agroup and we had camaraderie.By the time I was 19 I was growing out of the BNP. Imoved to London for work and stopped going tomeetings. But I still hated all foreigners, especiallyMuslims. Over the next few years I became involvedwith people who went to Muslim meetings in Hyde Park,mainly to cause trouble.Then, one day in 1989, I was walking past a secondhandbook stall by the Royal Festival Hall when a covercaught my eye: it was the most beautiful picture, inthe most gorgeous colours, of a building. I didn'tknow what the book was, but it was only 20p so Ibought it. I thought I'd buy a cheap frame and have anice picture for my wall. I had no idea until I gothome that I had bought the Qur'an.I was horrified when I found out. My initial reactionwas to throw it away. But then I got curious. Istarted reading it, thinking I would find things touse against Muslims; I thought it would be filled withcontradictions. When I was young, my mum always madeher views known and from her I acquired a love ofdebating. Now, I would regularly go and debate withMuslims at Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park. As I did so,I started to get a very different picture of Islam.Seeing people pray in unison was such a powerfulimage.A few years later, I returned to the north-east - I'dgot a job as a chef. When I saw a group of Muslims atan Islamic book stall in Newcastle, I thought, "Here'sanother group I can wind up; I probably know moreabout Islam than they do." But I was shocked when Iapproached them; they were very knowledgeable. I keptgoing back because I enjoyed debating with them, andafter four weeks they challenged me.They wanted me to try to disprove the Qur'an andconvince them my way of life was better. They said ifI succeeded they would become Christians, but if Ifailed I should become a Muslim. I accepted thechallenge. But after months of returning to the stalland debating, I realised I was losing and panicked. Istopped going to the stall.Three years had passed when I bumped into one of theguys from the stall. As I thought about what I wantedto do, I felt as if a big rock were crushing me, butwhen I told him I wanted to convert, I had a totalsense of peace. I made my final decision on WednesdayNovember 17 1996 and converted the following day. Ihave been close to the Hizb ut-Tahrir group eversince: I became a Muslim because of them; they werethe guys at the stall.When I told my family, my sister stopped talking tome. My father was horrified but didn't want to discussit. My mother thought it was a phase I was goingthrough and was more worried about what the neighbourswould think. She now lets me pray in the house, butrefuses to call me Muhammad (I was born John Ord).I met my wife, who is Pakistani, after converting. Welive in Birmingham, where she works as a primaryschool teacher. I have just started a degree in socialwork. When I look back, I can't believe the things Idid; it feels like a different person and a differentlife. Ironically, because of the backlash from theLondon bombings, I now fear attack, and have startedgoing out in my English clothes. In them I look like abearded, middle-aged white guy.

Persian Ramayana, Arabic Gita preserved

http://www.deccan.com/home/homedetails.asp
Hyderabad, Sept. 24: In this age of religious bigotry,many Muslim organisations of the State are workingtirelessly to preserve rare Hindu scriptures. The117-year-old Dairatul Maarif treasures its copy of theArabic version of the Bhagawad Gita, probably the onlyone of its kind in the world. Similarly valued is thePersian Ramayana, estimated to be more than 600 yearsold, which is kept in the library-cum-research centreof the 132-year-old Jamia Nizamia.The Arabic Gita and the Persian Ramayana are merelytwo among the 200-odd rare Hindu religious manuscriptsand books preserved in various Muslim researchinstitutes including madarasas. These organisationstake great care of such manuscripts. The organisationsuse state-of-the-art methods to protect them forposterity. Several manuscripts been digitised and theCD versions are available for scholars of comparativereligion.The Arabic version of the Holy Gita, known as Al Kita,is about 100 years old. The Jamia Nizamia, a deemeduniversity with international recognition, alsopossesses a 500-year-old manuscript of the Mahabharatain Persian. Both these documents have been laminatedand preserved by Nizamia. “They are invaluable,” saidSyed Akbar Nizamuddin, chancellor of Jamia Nizamia.“The Mahabharata manuscript is in bad shape and wehave now carefully hand-laminated it. We have alsomicro-filmed and digitised the scriptures.” Al Kita was published by Dairatul Maarif in thebeginning of the last century on the request of anoble from Kolkata. Its pirated editions are availablein the Gulf countries. Another valuable possession ofthe Daira is the Arabic version of RabindranathTagore’s great Geetanjali.“There’s nothing comm-unal about knowledge,” MuftiKhaleel Ahmad, the grand mufti and vice-chancellor ofthe Nizamia, told this correspondent. “Only people arecommunal. Reading books of different religionsenha-nces one’s understanding. No religion teacheshatred,” the Mufti said.Dozens of researchers visit these libraries to studythe rare documents. The Islamic Academy of ComparativeReligion also has in its possession score of Hindureligious books, including 188 Upanishads, four Vedas,Bhagawad Gi-ta, Valmiki Ramayana, Ma-nusmriti andseveral Pura-nas. It also possesses 30 Bibles inHebrew, Arabic, Urdu, Telugu and Greek. “Luckily, our books are still in good condition,” saidM. Asifuddin, president of IACR. “We have been takinggreat care to preserve them.” Another city Muslimorganisation labouriously preserving Hindu scripturesis the Iqbal Academy. It has rare copies of the Gitaand Mahabharata. The Asafia Library and the HEH NizamTrust’s Library have several Hindu scriptures in Urdu,Persian and Arabic. “Study of different religionswill help prevent misconceptions, hatred andmistrust,” said secretary of the All-India MuslimPer-sonal Law Board Abdul Rahim Qureshi.“We can eradicate social evils by promoting religiousvalues,” Queshi said. Hafiz Shujath Hussain, aresearch scholar poring over the Al Kita, said it washeartening to see Muslim organisations preserve suchrare manuscripts. “We have to take care to keep themsafe for ever,” he said.

Sake Dean Mahomed: The man who opened Britain's first curry house, nearly 200 yars ago

Martin Hickman looks at the extraordinary man who spiced up the life of an entire nation
Published: 30 September 2005
Diners tucking into beef madras in the country's curry houses tonight may not appreciate their debt to one Sake Dean Mahomed. Almost 200 years before the Indian restaurant became a fixture on the British high street, Mahomed, a Muslim soldier, founded the first curry establishment in Britain, the Hindoostane Coffee House in Portman Square, London. It gave the gentry of Georgian England their first taste of spicy dishes.
Two centuries later, the British are still in love with dishes flavoured with cumin, coriander, ginger, fenugreek, cayenne pepper and caraway. We spend an extraordinary £2.5bn in Indian restaurants every year.
Around 80 per cent of "Indian" restaurants are actually owned by Bangladeshis, and their cuisine derives not just from India but Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. And curry describes not just one dish, but a meal and the cooking of an entire subcontinent.
Increasingly, we eat curries not just in restaurants but in our own living rooms; in takeaways; from supermarkets and, on occasion, those that we have rustled up ourselves having roasted the spices and mashed them in a pestle and mortar. But it is the Indian restaurant that captures the imagination - and in particular the remarkable story of how an immigrant cuisine conquered an indigenous food in just decades.
By 1939, there were six Indian restaurants in Britain, but Indians arriving to help with the rebuilding of London after the Blitz sowed the seeds of our obsession. Initially migrant workers established cafés and canteens for their own communities, but enterprising Bangladeshis soon began to open restaurants for the natives. They catered to what they thought the British wanted: waiters in dinner jackets, red flock wallpaper and crisp white table linen.
"It was something the working man had never seen, and it was in a back street at a price that everyone could afford," says Pat Chapman, who runs the Curry Club, which has 5,000 members. "It tasted great, was cheap and was mildly addictive." By 1982 there were 3,500 Indian restaurants in Britain, and in the last 20 years their numbers have more than doubled - expanding from cities to almost every small town in the country. There are now about 8,500 Indian restaurants in the UK, and, reputedly, there more Indian chefs in London than in Delhi.
The curry has entered national consciousness to the extent that Robin Cook suggested four years ago that chicken tikka masala had become the national dish. It is certainly the best-selling curry in Indian restaurants, and is favoured by 16 per cent of diners.
As tastes have developed, so a new type of Indian restaurant has sprung up. A more entrepreneurial breed of Indian businessmen is determined to move the curry house up-market, with more regionalised menus and posher wine lists. Plush establishments such as Tamarind in Mayfair and Zaika in Kensington are far removed from the back-street curry house beloved of the post-pub brigade.
At the Cinnamon Club in Westminster, for instance, MPs and businessmen can spend £60 a head eating dishes like Rajasthani goat curry with garlic, chilli and cloves in the rarefied atmosphere of a converted Victorian library. Vivek Singh, the restaurant's executive chef, says: "People now are becoming a lot more sophisticated. There's an understanding of the more subtle use of spices."
Singh claims that the biggest challenge facing Indian restaurants is to innovate in order to see off the threat posed by other world cuisines. Indian food's very success could cause its downfall. Emboldened by our enjoyment of curry, Britons have begun to explore Thai, Mexican, Japanese and even Mongolian and Vietnamese food.
"I think [Indian food] has had its hey-day," says Singh. "Hereafter the way forward is how it's going to be established and now it's going to be driven by what kind of creativity and imagination going into it."
A survey published by Mintel in April suggested that the Indian home food market had fallen back from £500m a year in 2003 to £490m in 2005. But Pat Chapman is not convinced that the Indian food boom is ending. The number of restaurants has stabilised in the last few years, he says, but the average establishment has grown in size.
There have, though, been unwelcome headlines about the quality of food in some Indian restaurants, and in particular about the use of food dyes and flavour enhancers. An investigation by Surrey Trading Standards officers last year found that half of the restaurants they visited were using "illegal and potentially dangerous" levels of food dye in chicken tikka masala. Only 44 of the dishes they sampled from 102 restaurants were within legal limits for tartrazine (E102) and other E-numbers.
Problems with additives would not have been uppermost in the mind of Sake Dean Mahomed, the originator of the British curry house. Yesterday, the Lord Mayor of Westminster recognised the heroic culinary achievement of Mahomed and focused attention on his turbulent life and times by unveiling a plaque marking the spot where his first restaurant stood, at 102 George Street.
Like the spices that he popularised, Mahomed travelled from the Indian subcontinent to take a special - and historic - place in English society. As an 11-year-old he entered the East India Company Army in 1769, rising to the rank of captain. He became best friends with a Captain Godfrey Baker and accompanied him on his return to Ireland via Dartmouth.
In Cork, Mahomed became Captain Baker's house manager. There, he married Jane Daly, the daughter of a wealthy Irish family, and wrote The Travels of Dean Mahomed, the first book in English published by an Indian. He went on to become an assistant to Sir Basil Cochrane, a wealthy former employee, or "nabob", of the East India Company. Ever enterprising, Mahomed is reputed to have introduced shampoo to England while working working at Sir Basil's "vapour bath" in Portman Square.
In 1810, Mahomed opened his Indian restaurant, which The Epicures Almanak of the day described as a place "for the nobility and Gentry, where they might enjoy the Hookha with real Chilm tobacco and Indian dishes of the highest perfection".
Alas, Mahomed appeared to be at least a century ahead of his time. He was declared bankrupt in 1812 and was forced to advertise his services as a valet to wealthy gentlemen.
In a footnote to the curry story, he revived his career by opening special treatment baths in Brighton, where he became "shampoo surgeon" to the dandyish Prince of Wales, George IV, and then to William IV. He published another book, Shampooing or Benefits Resulting from the use of Indian Medical Vapour Bath in 1822, which became a bestseller. He died in December 1850. A tombstone in St Nicholas' churchyard in Brighton marks the last resting place of Britain's first Indian restaurateur. It reads simply: "Sake Dean Mahomed of Patna Hindoostan."
Diners tucking into beef madras in the country's curry houses tonight may not appreciate their debt to one Sake Dean Mahomed. Almost 200 years before the Indian restaurant became a fixture on the British high street, Mahomed, a Muslim soldier, founded the first curry establishment in Britain, the Hindoostane Coffee House in Portman Square, London. It gave the gentry of Georgian England their first taste of spicy dishes.
Two centuries later, the British are still in love with dishes flavoured with cumin, coriander, ginger, fenugreek, cayenne pepper and caraway. We spend an extraordinary £2.5bn in Indian restaurants every year.
Around 80 per cent of "Indian" restaurants are actually owned by Bangladeshis, and their cuisine derives not just from India but Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. And curry describes not just one dish, but a meal and the cooking of an entire subcontinent.
Increasingly, we eat curries not just in restaurants but in our own living rooms; in takeaways; from supermarkets and, on occasion, those that we have rustled up ourselves having roasted the spices and mashed them in a pestle and mortar. But it is the Indian restaurant that captures the imagination - and in particular the remarkable story of how an immigrant cuisine conquered an indigenous food in just decades.
By 1939, there were six Indian restaurants in Britain, but Indians arriving to help with the rebuilding of London after the Blitz sowed the seeds of our obsession. Initially migrant workers established cafés and canteens for their own communities, but enterprising Bangladeshis soon began to open restaurants for the natives. They catered to what they thought the British wanted: waiters in dinner jackets, red flock wallpaper and crisp white table linen.
"It was something the working man had never seen, and it was in a back street at a price that everyone could afford," says Pat Chapman, who runs the Curry Club, which has 5,000 members. "It tasted great, was cheap and was mildly addictive." By 1982 there were 3,500 Indian restaurants in Britain, and in the last 20 years their numbers have more than doubled - expanding from cities to almost every small town in the country. There are now about 8,500 Indian restaurants in the UK, and, reputedly, there more Indian chefs in London than in Delhi.
The curry has entered national consciousness to the extent that Robin Cook suggested four years ago that chicken tikka masala had become the national dish. It is certainly the best-selling curry in Indian restaurants, and is favoured by 16 per cent of diners.
As tastes have developed, so a new type of Indian restaurant has sprung up. A more entrepreneurial breed of Indian businessmen is determined to move the curry house up-market, with more regionalised menus and posher wine lists. Plush establishments such as Tamarind in Mayfair and Zaika in Kensington are far removed from the back-street curry house beloved of the post-pub brigade.
At the Cinnamon Club in Westminster, for instance, MPs and businessmen can spend £60 a head eating dishes like Rajasthani goat curry with garlic, chilli and cloves in the rarefied atmosphere of a converted Victorian library. Vivek Singh, the restaurant's executive chef, says: "People now are becoming a lot more sophisticated. There's an understanding of the more subtle use of spices."
Singh claims that the biggest challenge facing Indian restaurants is to innovate in order to see off the threat posed by other world cuisines. Indian food's very success could cause its downfall. Emboldened by our enjoyment of curry, Britons have begun to explore Thai, Mexican, Japanese and even Mongolian and Vietnamese food.
"I think [Indian food] has had its hey-day," says Singh. "Hereafter the way forward is how it's going to be established and now it's going to be driven by what kind of creativity and imagination going into it."
A survey published by Mintel in April suggested that the Indian home food market had fallen back from £500m a year in 2003 to £490m in 2005. But Pat Chapman is not convinced that the Indian food boom is ending. The number of restaurants has stabilised in the last few years, he says, but the average establishment has grown in size.
There have, though, been unwelcome headlines about the quality of food in some Indian restaurants, and in particular about the use of food dyes and flavour enhancers. An investigation by Surrey Trading Standards officers last year found that half of the restaurants they visited were using "illegal and potentially dangerous" levels of food dye in chicken tikka masala. Only 44 of the dishes they sampled from 102 restaurants were within legal limits for tartrazine (E102) and other E-numbers.
Problems with additives would not have been uppermost in the mind of Sake Dean Mahomed, the originator of the British curry house. Yesterday, the Lord Mayor of Westminster recognised the heroic culinary achievement of Mahomed and focused attention on his turbulent life and times by unveiling a plaque marking the spot where his first restaurant stood, at 102 George Street.
Like the spices that he popularised, Mahomed travelled from the Indian subcontinent to take a special - and historic - place in English society. As an 11-year-old he entered the East India Company Army in 1769, rising to the rank of captain. He became best friends with a Captain Godfrey Baker and accompanied him on his return to Ireland via Dartmouth.
In Cork, Mahomed became Captain Baker's house manager. There, he married Jane Daly, the daughter of a wealthy Irish family, and wrote The Travels of Dean Mahomed, the first book in English published by an Indian. He went on to become an assistant to Sir Basil Cochrane, a wealthy former employee, or "nabob", of the East India Company. Ever enterprising, Mahomed is reputed to have introduced shampoo to England while working working at Sir Basil's "vapour bath" in Portman Square.
In 1810, Mahomed opened his Indian restaurant, which The Epicures Almanak of the day described as a place "for the nobility and Gentry, where they might enjoy the Hookha with real Chilm tobacco and Indian dishes of the highest perfection".
Alas, Mahomed appeared to be at least a century ahead of his time. He was declared bankrupt in 1812 and was forced to advertise his services as a valet to wealthy gentlemen.
In a footnote to the curry story, he revived his career by opening special treatment baths in Brighton, where he became "shampoo surgeon" to the dandyish Prince of Wales, George IV, and then to William IV. He published another book, Shampooing or Benefits Resulting from the use of Indian Medical Vapour Bath in 1822, which became a bestseller. He died in December 1850. A tombstone in St Nicholas' churchyard in Brighton marks the last resting place of Britain's first Indian restaurateur. It reads simply: "Sake Dean Mahomed of Patna Hindoostan."