Friday, February 18, 2005

Lebanon: A Cedar Revolution to Counter Russian Missiles For Damascus

By K Gajendra Singh

Al-Jazeerah, February 18, 2005



The US attempt to organize a franchised ‘Cedar’ revolution in Lebanon , like the Orange revolution in Ukraine and the Rose revolution in Georgia , is to counter Moscow’s return into Middle East . Russia would be soon delivering short range missiles to Damascus , to ease US pressure in Ukraine , Georgia and elsewhere . The sale of missiles to Syria was finalized during Syrian President Basher Assad’s recent visit to Moscow. But it could ignite the most inflammable tinderbox in the region , Lebanon ,which saw its polity and economy stabilised and rebuilt over the last 15 years following a 15 years of civil war from 1976 .The consequences would be horrendous . The mayhem of the civil war had added ‘Lebanonisation’ to the lexicon
Following the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Shafiq Hariri in Beirut on 14 February , almost spontaneous demonstrations , outcries followed by quick US actions like recall of its Ambassador from Damascus , which has been blamed for the bomb blasts killing Harari , by innuendo , implication and even directly by some US lawmakers, as usual cheer led by US led corporate media , looks too familiar , coming as it does when Russia is to transfer low range missiles to Damascus .

The organized spontaneity and the cacophony of opposition noises in Lebanon look like other recent franchised revolutions , in Georgia and in Ukraine , apart from overthrow of Milosevic in Serbia. While Europe Union openly sided with USA in the orange revolution in Ukraine , which will adversely affect its relations with Russia ,this time France , a former colonial power in Syria and Lebanon joined Washington,
“If Syria was involved, the move would represent an act of uncharacteristically brazen recklessness on the part of a regime instinctively cautious in matters involving its own survival.”, said Time magazine .Having spent decades in the region the author knows the Syrians to be sophisticated operators .By having a hand in the killing of Hariri Syria would not like to commit Harakiri , now under daily pressure from US and Israel , the latter intrudes into its sovereign air space and occupies its Golan Heights since 1967 war.,President Assad condemned Hariri's killing as a “horrible terrorist act,” but that did not dim the ire of Lebanese opposition groups and the Bush administration.Syrian forces first arrived in Beirut in 1976, eventually enforcing a fragile peace between rival Lebanese factions and armed Palestinian refugees, and running the country as Syria's backyard ever since. It now keeps about 15,000 troops in the Beka'a valley. Fresh Lebanese elections are scheduled for May, and Hariri was under mounting pressure to take the lead in an opposition campaign to rally a vote for ousting Syrian troops.
Attempts are being made to unite all anti-Syrian factions which fought a devastating civil war between 1975 and 1990. Christians, Druze, and Shia and Sunni Muslims were in the funeral procession numbering in over a hundred thousand . The US assistant secretary of state, William Burns, who attended the funeral, said Hariri's death must give renewed impetus to achieving a free, independent and sovereign Lebanon, and "what that means is the complete and immediate withdrawal by Syria of all of its forces in Lebanon".
The US, with the backing of France, pushed through UN Security Council resolution 1559 in September, calling on Syria to withdraw its troops. Jacques Chirac, the French president, a personal friend of Hariri, flew to Beirut to offer his condolences. He praised Hariri for his fight for democracy and independence. Lebanon government has resisted pressure for an international investigation on the murder, but has invited Swiss explosives experts to help.
Resolution 1559 has been strenuously resisted not only by Syria, but also by the pro-Damascus Lebanese authorities, particularly President Emile Lahoud. The White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said that Hariri's murder was "an attempt to stifle these efforts to build an independent, sovereign Lebanon, free of foreign domination." Eyes are now turned to the Security Council to see if a new resolution is passed, perhaps imposing more sanctions on Syria.. Russia is angry with US and will not cooperate nor would perhaps China.

President Assad's extension of Lahoud's mandate last September - triggered the confrontation between Syria and the opposition - is seen as a sign of firmness in facing up to American and French pressures. Lebanese government officials and Syrian allies have accused the opposition of being in the pocket of the United States and Israel.

It appears that Hariri was leaning toward formally joining the opposition, which he had hesitated to do. Apart from having in the most prominent Lebanese Sunni, widening the opposition front's multi-sectarian base; it would also have brought Hariri's ample purse to support opposition in the elections next spring. “Hariri was the natural cornerstone of a post-Syrian-withdrawal shadow government.”BBC re-telecast a “Hard Talk” interview after 11 September, 2001 in which Hariri refused to declare Hizbullah a terrorist organization and instead declared Israel an enemy.Syria has cultivated politicians from all ends of the sectarian divide, and controlling Lebanon's own intelligence and security services. More than visions of historic “Greater Syria” concept” there are certainly economic benefits for Syria to maintain control over its economically dynamic neighbor whose progress and integration into the world economy puts Syria's own decrepit economy to shame. But Lebanon's primary importance to Damascus is its value as a strategic trump card. The organizing principle of Syrian foreign policy over the past four decades has been to find ways of pressuring Israel to return the Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since the war of 1967. Syria's presence in Lebanon, and particularly its support for the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia, became its key strategic bargaining chips with Israel, its Lebanese proxies have posed a constant security on Israel's northern border for the past quarter century. Losing Lebanon would strip a regime already dangerously isolated within the Arab world of the last of its leverage in dealing with Israel. “said Time magazine.The U.N. Security Council approved a statement urging the Lebanese government to "bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of this heinous terrorist act." Lebanon's interior minister suggested a suicide bomber aided by "international parties" may have been behind it.
Apart from a rogue Syrian intelligence operatives, even factions among Lebanon's myriad religious groups have been accused . Lebanese authorities have described responsibility claims by previously unknown Islamic militants as not credible.
In Washington for meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney and Ms Rice, the Egyptian foreign minister, Ahmed About Gheit, said "it is still premature to reach conclusions" about Hariri's assassination. Speaking at the Brookings Institution thinktank, Gheit said he hoped it would not touch off a cycle of killings and push Lebanon into civil war.
Real reason –Russian Misssiles for Syria ;On 16 February , Moscow confirmed that it will sell a new air defence missile system to Syria, overlooking Israeli concern followed by US objections. It said it was only for close-range use and would not upset the balance of military forces in the Middle East. The system would be mounted on vehicles and could not be stripped down for man-portable shoulder-launch use. "This type of system is not mobile, these are not man-portable anti-aircraft systems, and without special means of transport their use is impossible," a Russian official said. He also repeated Moscow's recent denials of any plans to sell longer-range tactical Iskander missiles to Syria, which could reach any target in Israel , including its nuclear reactor Dimona.
"Negotiations are now taking place on delivery to Damascus of the Strelets close-range anti-air system," Interfax news agency quoted an unnamed senior defence ministry official.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said at a news conference on 16 February in Jerusalem that Israel was informed by Russia that a sale of weapons to Syria would go ahead despite Israeli objections. "We worry about that and we don't think that that should have happened," he added .
Russian President Vladimir Putin said last month that the sale would not upset the balance of power in the Middle East and that it involved equipment that could solely be used for defensive purposes. He said in an interview with daily the Jerusalem Post that "we won't bring to the region weapons that can be used by terrorists or that can be transferred to terrorists without controls."
Another country , Afghanistan also had foreign soldiers , which the US led West and conservative Muslim regimes went to oust in 1979 and to establish democracy .That country lies destroyed and shattered , even though the Soviet Russian troops left in 1989 .In came Talebans and Al Qaida which stunned USA on September 11 , 2001 .Elections were recently held in Afghanistan , over which US President George W, Bush crowed , without “convincing” many except his media brain washed supporters in USA .These could be conducted only with help from democrat Gen Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan , where the opposition is up in arms against his keeping on the military uniform . Gen Musharraf persuaded the Mujahddins , Talebans and war lords to let elections be held . He was promptly rewarded by USA in hundreds of US$ millions of aid.
US Reaction to Hariris’s Death;
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked US allies to join in pressurising Syria to end its presence in Lebanon and its support of terrorism. She told the US Congress, if other countries "send Syria a message" that its conduct is unacceptable, "then perhaps the Syrians will start to worry more about their isolation . . . politically and economically." Rice said that the message sent by recalling the US ambassador was "an important one, and we'll see how they respond." She added that other measures were possible, saying, "We continue to review what else we might do." She did acknowledge that it was not clear who was behind Hariri's killing, but US administration argued that Syria's presence in Lebanon was responsible for such attacks.

The Syrians came in Damascus after an accord in 1976, while USA invaded Syria’s neighbour Iraq against the wishes of the UN .It has not given much convincing explanations for mayhem carried out in that country . On Iraq , USA remains isolated , has shown little accountability under Geneva conventions and the man who advised ignoring the conventions will become like minister of interior in other countries .
Ms Rice did admit that no other country imposed economic and trade sanctions against Damascus, which the U.S. Congress did two years ago. US threatened to impose more sanctions .But "there's no doubt that Syria is a big problem," she told members of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee for 2006 budget discussions. Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee told Rice that the United States should be forceful in its dealings with Damascus. "I urge you not to let Syria off the hook," said Sen. George Allen

But Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who grilled Rice during hearings , even questioning her integrity added a realty check .She said Americans were told before the war on Iraq that U.S. allies would help cover the cost of the mission, now estimated to total about $250 billion. In giving new aid to the coalition partners, including Poland and Ukraine, "in essence, we're paying them for what they did," Boxer said. "We were told there would be financial burden sharing; and at the end of the day, there isn't."

Even the U.S. House of Representatives joined in condemning Syria ( as yet without any proof) , paid tribute to Rafik Hariri, and called for Syria to withdraw troops from Lebanon. US troops are staying in Iraq for stability not Syria’s in Lebanon.A resolution is under consideration to honor Hariri but the session was devoted to criticism of Syria's continuing occupation of Lebanon. Another Congressman recalled the demonstrations by Lebanese calling for Syria's withdrawal from Lebanon as the key issue for Lebanon. "There is no proof that Syria was directly responsible for this assassination,” he said. “But there is no doubt that Syria has remained in Lebanon far longer either than their mandate, or than in the agreements under the Taif Accords of 1989."Congressman Eliot Engel, who wrote the Syria Accountability Act Congress approved last year imposing sanctions on Damascus, has urged the Bush administration to ensure that the Syria Accountability Act is fully implemented. That law calls on Syria, among other things, to halt support for terrorism, end its occupation of Lebanon, and stop development of any weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. "It is clear to me, although the evidence is being gathered, but I suspect that this assassination has some ties to Damascus, to the regime in Damascus,” he noted. “The Syrians have allowed Lebanon to destablize, and this is part and parcel of the result.During her safari the Europeans listened and clapped politely to Ms Rice , but were hardly overwhelmed with the marketing of the same US agenda , only less stridently than the boss. She might be considered eloquent but hardly convincing .
Iran - Syria United Front ;
Iran and Syria threatened daily by the Bush administration and the Israel government, on 16 February formed a mutual self-defence pact to confront the "threats" facing them. This was announced after a meeting in Tehran between the Iranian vice-president, Mohammed Reza Aref, and the Syrian prime minister, Naji al-Otari." At this sensitive point, the two countries require a united front due to numerous challenges," said Otari. Aref added: "We are ready to help Syria on all grounds to confront threats." Syria and Iran have been together in the past too .
Of course while US leaders make conflicting statements on Iran’s nuclear program ,Israeli Foreign Minister, Silvan Shalom, speaking in London predicted that Tehran would have the knowledge to produce a nuclear weapon within six months. He said that Iran was preparing nuclear weapons that would be able to target "London, Paris and Madrid" by the end of the decade. "We believe the Iranians will never abandon their dreams" of nuclear weapons, Shalom said. "It is not Israel's problem any more, it is the world's problem." It is a strange statement coming from Israel , which reportedly has over 100 nuclear bombs.Historical Background;

When the armies of Islam erupted from the Arabian desert and carved an empire from the Atlantic to China in the 7th Century , Lebanon with its mountains provided refuge for persecuted Christian and Muslim sects alike. After Ottomans annexed the caliphate and guardianship of Mecca and Medina in 16th century, the region became a peaceful backwater until World War I. During Ottoman era Lebanon evolved a social and political system of its own. Ottoman Aleppo or Tripoli governed the north, Damascus the centre, and Sidon the south. Coastal Lebanon and al-Biqah valley were usually ruled more directly by Istanbul, while Mt. Lebanon enjoyed semiautonomous status.

But when Turkey sided with Germany in the First World War , Britain, to protect its Indian possessions and the Suez Canal lifeline, encouraged Arabs under Hashemite ruler Sharif Hussein of Hijaj to revolt against the caliph in Istanbul (and deputed spy T E Lawrence to help out). The war's end did not bring freedom to the Arabs as promised; because , at the same time, by secret Sykes-Picot agreement, the British and French arbitrarily divided the sultan's Arab domains and their warring populations of Shi'ites, Sunnis, Alawite Muslims, Druse, and Christians. The French took most of greater Syria, dividing it into Syria and Christian-dominated Lebanon. The British kept Palestine, Iraq and the rest of Arabia.

When Sharif Hussein's son Emir Feisel arrived to claim Damascus, Syria, the French chased him out. So the British installed him on the Iraqi throne. When the other son, Emir Abdullah, turned up in Amman, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, dining in a Jerusalem hotel, reportedly drew on a napkin the borders of a new Emirate of Trans-Jordan, encompassing wasteland vaguely claimed by Syrians, Saudis and Iraqis.

By the 1917 Balfour Declaration Britain had also promised a homeland for Jews in Palestine. European Jews began emigrating to Palestine, and the trickle became a flood with the rise of anti-Semitic policies in Nazi Germany and elsewhere in Europe. After World War II, the state of Israel, carved out of British Palestine, was not recognized by the Arabs. The 1948 Arab-Israeli war allowed Israel to expand its area, while Jordan annexed the West Bank and Egypt took over Gaza. In the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured the West bank and Gaza and Syria’s Golan heights. Thus were laid the foundations for most of the problems of the region.

The contemporary state of Lebanon came into being in 1920 when France, administered it as a League of Nations mandate. The Maronites, strongly pro-French by tradition, welcomed this, and during the next 20 years, while France held the mandate, the Maronites were favoured. The expansion of prewar Lebanon into Greater Lebanon, however, changed the balance of the population. Although the Maronites were the largest single element, they no longer formed a majority. The population was more or less equally divided between Christians and Muslims, and a large section of it wanted neither to be ruled by France nor to be part of an independent Lebanon, but rather to join Syrian or an Arab state

Lebanon became a republic in 1926 and achieved independence in 1943. Its rugged, mountainous terrain served throughout history as an asylum for diverse religious and ethnic groups and for political dissidents. The majority of Lebanese now are Muslims ,( with Shiite the most numerous ) followed by Christians with Maronites the largest group, Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholics , and Druzes and Armenians and, even a very small minority of Jews. Lebanon is one of the most densely populated countries in the Mediterranean area. It has one of the highest rates of literacy.

Lebanon is a republic with a parliamentary system of government. Its constitution, promulgated in 1926 during the French mandate was modified by several subsequent amendments. According to the 1989 Taif agreement, parliamentary seats are apportioned equally between Christian and Muslim sects, thereby replacing an earlier ratio that had favoured Christians. This sectarian distribution is also observed in appointments to public office and jobs.

The head of state is the president, who is elected by a two-thirds majority of the National Assembly for a term of six years and is eligible for reelection only after the lapse of an additional six years. By an unwritten convention, the president must be a Maronite Christian, the premier a Sunnite Muslim, and the speaker of the National Assembly a Shiite. The Cabinet members' portfolios are organized to reflect the sectarian balance and holds more executive power than the president. It requires a vote of confidence from the assembly. A Cabinet usually falls because of internal dissension, societal strife, or pressure exerted by foreign states. The control of the official central government is at best precarious; sectarian militias and foreign countries exert great influence .

Lebanon has to grapple with internal problems of social and economic organization, and also to struggle to define its position in relation to Israel, to its Arab neighbours, and to Palestinian refugees living in Lebanon. The Lebanese pluralistic communal structure eventually collapsed under the pressures of this struggle. Communal rivalries over political power became so exacerbated by the complex issues that arose from the Palestinian question that a breakdown of the governmental system resulted from an extremely damaging civil war that began in 1975.

The civil war was a catastrophe for the Lebanese, whose country lay in ruins. There seemed to be no compromise acceptable to the Muslims, who numbered more than half the population, and to the Christians, who were determined to keep their control of key government institutions. Foreign intervention merely restrained open, full scale warfare. Economic destruction was massive, but this was overcome to a certain extent by increased remittances from Lebanese working abroad during the boom years in the oil-producing countries.

Then Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to eliminate Palestine Libration Organisation (PLO) , a law into itself ., which had been expelled from Jordan in early 1970s .PLO Chief Yasser Arafat had to leave Beirut, but under the command and neglect of Defence Minister , thousands of helpless Palestinians , mostly women, children and old men were butchered by Christian militia, Israel’s allies .
A year after the Israeli withdrawal in 1982 from southern Lebanon, Hezbollah—Lebanon's main resistance force in the region—refused to consider that the country had regained its full sovereignty, since Israel still controlled the Sheba farms enclave and had not released all Lebanese prisoners of war, and Israeli warplanes patrolled Lebanese skies at will.
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks in the U.S., Lebanon tried to walk a tightrope. Lebanese officials were at pains to stress their condemnation of the attacks against civilians, while at the same time, they emphasized the distinction between terrorism and the struggle for liberation. Bush's statement for a Palestinian state was welcomed by Lebanese officials, who were under international pressure to naturalize about 330,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon . They were uneasy, about Washington targeting Hezbollah for attack as a terrorist organization.

In 1980s , the West had supported Iraq's long war against Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran, and the US had granted loans to Baghdad worth billions of dollars. For strategic reasons Syria sided with Iran .But in 1990-91 Gulf War , Syria along with most of the Arab world and Turkey joined Papa Bush coalition for various reasons , Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, money , cutting Saddam Hussein down to size , when Iraq at great human and money cost had stopped Khomeini’s Shiite revolution from expanding in the Arab world .Ironically , Shiite of Iraq have now become a major force after 30 January elections in Iraq . In both US led wars against Iraq, Israel and unwittingly Iran have gained .
This article was submitted by the author for publication at Al-Jazeerah on Feb 17, 2005. It was also published by Saag.com.

Mayans in Mexico’s Chiapas Region Convert to Islam

Deutsche Presse-Agentur Arab News

MEXICO CITY, 18 February 2005 — The colonial town of San Cristobal de las Casas in the highlands of the Mexican state of Chiapas is a much-loved tourist destination, known for its colorful Indian market.

Eleven years ago it made news across the world when the indigenous Indian population in the form of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) occupied the town and declared war on the Mexican government.

The bishop of San Cristobal at the time, Samuel Ruiz, became a figure on the world stage as he brought together representatives of the Zapatistas and the government in his cathedral.

Despite the predominance of Catholic Christianity in Mexico, Islam has established itself on the edge of the town, a little way off from the town’s beautiful and plentiful churches.

Some 300 people from the Tzotzil Mayan community now bow their heads daily in the direction of Makkah to pray to Allah.

In the madrasa — the Islamic school — children are learning the Qur’an, and many of them are also cared for, often under better circumstances than in their parental homes.

Some Tzotzils have even made the pilgrimage to Makkah.

Chiapas has been Christian since the Spanish conquest in 1524. Spanish missionaries taught the local indigenous population that God had become man in Christ and had died on the cross for mankind.

It is an historical irony that the man who came in 1995 to tell their descendants that the crucified man was not the son of God and that the true word of God lay in the words of the Qur’an was again a Spaniard.

The man from Granada was Aureliano Perez Yruela, a member of a Sunni sect. He quickly found new converts to Islam among the Tzotzil.

Most of them came from the district of San Juan Chamula, which borders San Cristobal and has long been the site of religious conflict.

Since the 1960s North American Protestant missionaries have been active there, and many families have converted from Catholicism.

They were forced out by their Catholic fellow-tribespeople and settled on the outskirts of San Cristobal. Some of these Presbyterians, Pentacostalists and Adventists have now converted again — this time to Islam.

“The whole development has taken place over three generations. The grandparents were traditional Catholics, in the 1970s some began converting to Protestantism and in 1995 they came to know Islam,” the anthropologist Gaspar Morquecho says.

In the view of Morquechos, the Chiapas community is being supported financially by foundations in Islamic countries. This enables the community to provide work, schooling, food and clothing for its members.

It is not only material benefit that has drawn the locals to Allah, but also intellectual curiosity.

“Contrary to widespread opinion here, the people of San Juan Chamula are not insular, but are open to new ideas,” Morquecho says.

When Perez Yruelas arrived in Chiapas the area was in political turmoil. The Indians who had newly converted to Islam immediately sought contact with the Zapatista movement.

“They sent them a comprehensive proposal on cooperation, but as far as I know the EZLN never answered them,” Morquecho says.

Now that Al-Qaeda has raised alarm across the world, the Mexican secret service, the CISEN, has become interested in the Islamic Mayans. As yet no anti-state activities have been uncovered.

There is also little indication that the small community will become a mass movement. In fact, the strict ideas on community life propagated by Perez Yruelas have led some families to break away yet again.

Thursday, February 17, 2005

Riba (interest) , its alternative

Lloyds TSB targets Muslim market Sandra HaurantTuesday February 15, 2005 http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1415095,00.htmlLloyds TSB today announced the launch of a currentaccount that adheres to Islamic rules on finance.The account has been designed to comply fully withIslamic law, or sharia, which forbids the payment andreceipt of interest, or riba. As such, the accountwill not pay interest on credit balances or have anoverdraft facility.The funds held by the bank on all shariah-compliantaccounts will also be held according to Islamic law.Under shariah, Muslims are not allowed to invest incompanies related to certain types of industry, suchas alcohol, tobacco, pornography, armaments andgambling.The new account is to be piloted in a handful ofbranches in cities across the UK, including Birminghamand Luton.Lloyds TSB is planning to launch furthersharia-compliant financial services later this year.There are almost two million Muslims in Britain, andthe bank will be competing for customers with HSBC,which has offered Islamic current accounts andmortgage-style products since 2003, and asharia-compliant pension since 2004, and with theIslamic Bank of Britain, the first bank to operatesolely in line with Islamic law.The newest branch of the Islamic Bank of Britain openstoday in Leicester. Its first branch opened lastSeptember in London's Edgware Road, followed shortlyafter by a second branch, in Birmingham.Gordon Rankin, current accounts director at LloydsTSB, said: "The Muslim community is one of the fastestgrowing in the UK and is very much part of the fabricof British life. However, until now their bankingneeds have been largely uncatered for and many BritishMuslims have often had to bank in a way that isagainst their principles."Provision of sharia-compliant financial servicesremains limited, and there has been particular concernamong Muslims due to receive the new child trust fundvouchers that there are no sharia-compliant productsin which to invest the money.Parents have a year in which to decide how to investtheir child's fund. For those who do not make achoice, the Inland Revenue will automatically investthe money in a stakeholder account, which could investin companies that do not comply with sharia.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Islamic banking 'goes mainstream' http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4264939.stmThe first High Street bank account compatible withIslamic sharia law is due to be introduced. The Lloyds TSB account will offer no interest oroverdraft facilities, as under Islamic law the receiptand payment of interest is forbidden. The introduction of the account follows the opening ofa specialist Islamic bank in the UK last year. Gordon Rankin of Lloyds TSB said its new account wouldmake Islamic banking "mainstream". "Our research shows that over three-quarters ofBritish Muslims want banking services that fit withtheir faith. "However, until now their banking needs have beenlargely uncatered for and many British Muslims haveoften had to bank in a way that is against theirprinciples," Mr Rankin said.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Q&A: Islamic finance Susan Smillie and Hilary OsborneTuesday February 15, 2005 http://money.guardian.co.uk/saving/banks/story/0,12410,1415117,00.htmlThe decision by Lloyds TSB to offer an Islamic currentaccount highlights the clash between the Muslim faithand the way western banks operate. Traditional UK bankaccounts and mortgages do not comply with Islam'ssharia law, so in the past people faced a big decision- compromise their beliefs or look for alternativeways to manage their finances.There are almost two million Muslims in the UK, soit's surprising that it has taken financial servicescompanies so long to wake up to this group ofpotential consumers by launching products which complywith Islamic law.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tuesday, February 15, 2005

Christian growth alarmingly high in NE

KOCHI, Feb 14 – The National Commission for Minorities (NCM) today said there has been “abnormally high” growth of Christian population in the North East, especially in the districts bordering Bangladesh, and the Commission had sought details from the Christian leadership. While the proportion of Christians in India has remained the same for both decades – 1991 and 2001 at 2.3 per cent – in terms of percentage, Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalaya have the highest percentage of Christians – 90 per cent, 87 per cent and 70.3 per cent respectively, NCM Chairman S Tarlochan Singh told reporters here.

The Commission today held a meeting on scientific analysis of census data of 2001 of the Christian community in India, in which Church heads, including Cardinal Mar Varkey Vithayathil, Major Archbishop of the Syro Malabar Church participated. The report, ‘Christians in India’, presented by Prof Ashish Bose, Chairman, NCM Expert committee on ‘Census Data On Religion’, was discussed at the meeting.

Later, addressing a press meet, Singh said given the ethnic demands and socio-cultural diversity in the north-eastern States, it would be “unscientific” to make hasty generalisations.

“We believe that the possibility of illegal Muslim migrants from Bangladesh reporting as Christians cannot be ruled out,” Singh said. There was every possibility of the migrants recording their religion as Christian as a survivial strategy, he said, adding this needs to be looked into.

Singh said the Commission had urged the Christian leadership to discuss the report. Singh said a related factor concerns Muslims marrying Naga or tribal women reporting as Christians.

Due to “disturbed” conditions in tea-garden areas, there was “out-migration” of tribals and Christians and with the return of normalcy most of these migrants might have returned to their earlier place of residence.

Another type of conversion, which is not forced, relates to enumeration of some Hindus, Buddhists and Tribals, who had reported in earlier Census as belonging to “other religions,” but at the 2001 Census reported themselves as Christians, he said.

Bose said analysis of data on religion in North East India leads to some intriguing questions about the role of illegal migration (of both Hindus and Muslims) from Bangladesh and also the controversial role of conversion to Christianity. In Tripura, while in 1991-2001, the Hindu population grew by 15 per cent, the Christian population grew by 121 per cent. There is no evidence of large scale migration of Christians from Bangladesh where the Christains are very small in number. This would make conversion the dominant factor explaining the high growth rate figures of Christians,he said.

In Assam, during the 1991-2001 decade in Dhubri district, the Christian growth rate was 66 per cent. The committee was surprised that in Assam as a whole, where the growth rate was 18.9 per cent during 1991-2001 for all religious communities, the Christian growth rate was as high as 32.5 per cent, even higher than the Muslim growth rate of 29.3 per cent, he added. In Gujarat also, the Christian population has grown very rapidly.

The question of foreign money in sensitive areas and “injecting politics in development programmes is another controversial issue which needs the attention from the Government,” Bose added.

Singh said the issue of female foeticide had not yet touched the Christian community. While the child sex ratio was 927 for all communities in India, it was much higher for Christians – 964. This shows that the girl child receives due care from the community. In Punjab, while the child sex ratio was as low as 798 for all communities, the Christian child sex ratio was 870, while in Gujarat it was 883 and 927 respectively.

Earlier, Cardinal Vithayathil in his opening remarks said it was an individual's personal choice to adopt the religion of his choice and there was no need for any forcible conversions. – PTI

Sunday, February 13, 2005

Donald Rumsfeld , George Orwell , and the Near Collapse of the empire

By Hassan El-Najjar
Al-Jazeerah, February 12, 2005

In a speech before a NATO security conference in Munich, Germany, today, the US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld urged Europeans to join his "war on terror" He warned them that "Radical Islamists do not seek an armistice with the civilized world. They will not negotiate a separate peace. Rather they seek to impose the totalitarian rule George Orwell described as 'a boot stomping on a human face -- forever," (Feb 12 issue of Al-Jazeerah: Rumsfeld Stresses Need for Allies in the "War on Terror).
It's amazing that Rumsfeld still doesn't want to admit that it is the US military presence in the Arabian Peninsula that led to the Alqaeda attacks on the US; and that the US invasion and occupation of Iraq is the cause of all the resistance, destruction, and civil war in Iraq today.
A US withdrawal from the Arabian Peninsula and Iraq will be a major step in ending the conflict, which he calls "war on terror." There will be no need for shedding any more American or Arab blood and there will be no need for more trillions of dollars of US national debt.
It is so sad that while Europe, China, Japan, and Russia are enjoying great economic and political progress and stability, the rulers of the United States are leading the country in the opposite direction.
They are dragging the US deeper into an astronomical national debt that has exceeded $7.6 trillion, with a permission from the rubber-stamp Congress to borrow one more trillion dollars to spend on the their "war on terror.
The neocon imperialist wars against the Arab and Muslim worlds have already devastated the US economy and caused the US dollar to lose more than one-third of its value. And it is just a matter of time until one country after another will replace their dollar reserves with Euro and other currencies.
The funniest part of Rumsfeld's speech was warning other NATO members from the danger of hypothetical futuristic Islamic state that may practice what George Orwell warned against. I'm afraid that we in the US need to take notice that the necons are changing the US into the capitalist totalitarian society Orwell has warned us against.
When is Rumsfeld and the rest of the Empire neocon Consuls going to wake up before it is too late?
When are they going to start managing the Empire in an intelligent and just way, instead of the stupid use of force that is devastating the Empire's Crown Jewel, the US?

Black History Month

Black History Month: Lessons for the American Muslims
By Abdus Sattar Ghazali
Al-Jazeerah, February 9, 2005

February marks the Black History Month - an annual celebration that has existed since 1926. But what are the origins of Black History Month and why it is important? Much of the credit can go to Harvard Scholar Dr. Carter G. Woodson, who was determined to bring Black History into the mainstream public arena. Woodson devoted his life to making "the world see the Negro as a participant rather than as a lay figure in history." African-American historian Dr. Charles Finch is right when he says: "No nation, no race can face the future unless it knows what it is capable of. This is the function of history." No doubt history is a light that illuminates the past and a key that unlocks the door to the future.
Forgetting past is obliterating the future. It was in this spirit that Dr. Woodson originally started a Negro History week in 1926 that in 1972 became Black History week, and then in1976 it was extended to an entire month. The month of February was chosen by Woodson to coincide with the birthdays of Fredrick Douglass (One of the foremost leaders of the abolitionist movement, which fought to end slavery within the United States in the decades prior to the Civil War.) and President Abraham Lincoln who issued the Emancipation Proclamation which laid the groundwork for the total abolition of slavery in the United States that was accomplished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1865.
Black history is mostly a struggle for civil rights. Since the Civil War, much of the concern over civil rights has focused on efforts to extend these rights fully to African Americans. The first legislative attempts to assure African Americans an equal political and legal status were the Civil Rights Acts of 1866, 1870, 1871, and 1875.
Throughout the twentieth century, African-Americans have waged an ongoing struggle for full economic, political, and cultural participation in American life. The 20th-century struggle to expand civil rights for African Americans has involved the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the Urban League, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and others. The civil-rights movement, led especially by Martin Luther King, Jr., in the late 1950s and 60s, and the executive leadership provided by President Lyndon B. Johnson, encouraged the passage of the most comprehensive civil-rights legislation to date, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, Roy Kaplan, USF professor for the Africana studies department argues that the segregation has taken a subtle shape: "Some of the struggles that have waged have succeeded. You don't have the kind of overt blatant segregation where you can't eat in this place or visit this place. It is more subtle. Now we have to get into the attitudes and beliefs." Behavior may be controlled by laws, national and international, but attitudes can only change through education and the elimination of ignorance. The Black History Month should be the reaffirmation of struggle and determination to change attitudes and heighten the understanding of the African experience.
The American Muslim community faces two challenges, legal and of attitude. Even though the American Muslim community was under pressure before 9/11 with the introduction of the so-called Secret Evidence Act but after 9/11 the civil liberties of the 7-million strong Muslim community were abridged and discrimination against Arabs and Muslims has been institutionalized and legalized. At the same time there has been a persistent campaign by media and political as well as religious leaders against the Islamic belief that sparked hate crimes.
Just few examples of legalized discrimination and stereotyping: American Muslims are fingerprinted, told that “they have no rights,” when they return after attending an Islamic gathering in Canada. Not only Muslim men but now Muslim women are called by the FBI for ‘interviews.’ Muslim charities remain target of the administration and the latest victim is the Dallas-based KinderUSA that has suspended operations, because it unfairly become the target of an investigation by the U.S. government. And one asks, what message the American people will get when a Marine commander says that it is fun to kill people (read Muslims) in Iraq and Afghanistan?
The American Muslim community has another daunting task of maintaining its unity and cohesion amid schemes to divide the community horizontally and vertically on the pretext of race, country of origin or branding some as Islamists and others as progressives and modernists.
Reverting to the lessons of the black history. The American Muslims should remember the fight and dream for freedom of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr., a symbol of this struggle, made his case through an appeal to values and tradition. King's achievements reflected his courage and character and he succeeded despite racism, with little physical or political power. The American Muslims must remember that, as with Dr. King, the answer lies within ourselves. We must adhere to the value of justice for all.
Civil rights laws and celebrations such as Black History Month have exposed the legal consequences of overt discriminatory practices and racial harassment. In the words of columnist, Bob Ray Sanders, until America is ready to embrace all of its people - of many different hues, cultures and religions - we will continue to commemorate the tragic, triumphant and glorious history of blacks.
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Executive Editor of the online magazine, American Muslim Perspective:
www.amperspective.com

Assam for Muslims

GUWAHATI, Feb 1 – In a corroboration of what has been suspected all along, a former super sleuth of Intelligence Bureau (IB) has confirmed that ‘Assam for Muslims’ was and continues to be a potent programme of the communalist Muslim organisations in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
Open Secrets, India’s Intelligence Unveiled by former Joint Director, Intelligence Bureau, Maloy Krishna Dhar, is likely to leave the Congress Party in general and a few of its leaders in particular red faced, as sinister plots including designs to topple elected Governments, links with fundamentalist organisations and underground outfits get uncovered, says a report in The Assam Tribune by its New Delhi correspondent Kalyan Barooah.
“There are ample scopes for a dispassionate analysis of the historic imbalances that Assam suffered from for over seven decades and the dubious roles played by the Indian National Congress, Indira Congress and the fanatic Muslim political and religious organisations. The gaping fault line created in Assam was not overlooked by Pakistan and its successor regime in Bangladesh,” Dhar commented.
“It should be sufficient to say that senior Congress leaders like Nehru and Sardar Patel had almost agreed to cede Assam and Eastern Bengal to Pakistan as demanded by MA Jinnah. Nationalist leaders like Gopinath Bordoloi and Mahatma Gandhi saved Assam and the rest of the North East for India,” he further said.
Dhar, who has had long stints in the North East and was no stranger to the region’s political inner dynamics, was himself a key player in several of the sordid dramas of toppling elected Governments in Assam and Manipur.
Did the then Chief Minister, late Hiteswar Saikia had a hand in formation of the outlawed ULFA? He had, if you believe the super sleuth.
In a startling revelation that is sure to create a storm in the State, Dhar has concluded that Hiteswar Saikia’s hands were clearly discernible behind the formation of the ULFA in 1979. The plot further thickens with further revelations that Saikia had developed close links with top ULFA leaders belonging to the Ahom community including its chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa, C-in-C, Paresh Baruah and Anoop Chetia.
A close acquaintance of the then Chief Minister, late Hiteswar Saikia, he was closely involved with Operations Bajrang and Rhino against the ULFA. It was also revealed that Saikia too was closely involved in planning and execution of Operation Bajrang. “The nitty-gritty of Operation Bajrang was worked out in collaboration with Hiteswar Saikia and certain key human assets provided by him. The wily Ahom leader had developed key human assets, mostly drawn from the Nepali, Bengali and Muslim communities. These assets were contacted in Calcutta and in certain rural locations in Meghalaya, he disclosed in his book.
Hiteswar’s Ahom ethnicity had helped him in establishing equation with Ahom Muttock (Thai-Ahom origin) leaders like Arabindo Rajkhowa, Golap Barua, Prodip Gogoi and Paresh Baruah.
“Some chilling details of Hiteswar’s linkages with the breakaway AASU leaders, who cobbled up with ULFA, were narrated to me by Samiran way back in 1981 during one of his clandestine visits to Delhi. At that point of time, I had treated his story as another application of dirty tricks by the inner coterie of Indira Gandhi,” Dhar wrote.
“That was the salient point of time when Indira Congress leaders like Hiteswar Saikia and Lalit Doley extended tacit support to the ULFA faction of the AASU and AAGSP. They blindly tried to use the Ahom nationalist card against the Muslims. Hiteswar did not do anything new. The Congress Party has the distinguished history of supporting divisive forces in the North East to its political advantage,” he said.
“My personal awareness of the complicated interrelationship between the ULFA and AASU and AGP, on the one hand, and the cream of the Indira Congress leaders on the other gave a creeping feeling. The feeling arose not out of version for Hiteswar. He was one of the illustrious flag posts of Indian nationalism in the North East.
“The allegation that he had patronised the early ULFA dialogues and extreme separatist was not unique in Indian politics. He followed the footsteps of his illustrious political colleagues, who, almost around the same time, had crafted out another Frankenstein in Punjab,” Dhar commended.
ULFA had gunned down number of Saikia’s close relatives including his brother.
“I had done what I had to do to help Hiteswar. But I had no illusion that he was the person responsible for aiding and abetting Indira Congress leaders like Santosh Mohan Dev to incite the Muslims, North Cachar tribals and the Bodos to organise dirty games against the AASU and the AGP.
On the much-flaunted Operation Bajrang, the man who was in thick of it described it as a mixed bag. “Operation Bajrang offered us a mixed bag. The infected layers in the Assam administration had leaked out information about the impending Army operations. Most of the camps were abandoned by the ULFA leaders, some in the nick of the moment, leaving behind huge cash (over 50 million) and gold bars.
Certain recovered materials indicated that ULFA leaders and cadres either believed in family planning or took abundant precaution against AIDS. They enjoyed sex! It was revealed.
The former IB joint Director also confirms ULFA close links with ISI of Pakistan and DGFI of Bangladesh. Though the top leadership of ULFA had taken shelter in Bangladesh with active support of the ISI operatives and under the tutelage of the DGFI, its massive organisational wings managed to strengthen grass root support inside Assam.
Dhar’s narrative indicated that there were differences between Home Ministry and Saikia’s Government over the move to split the ULFA in 1991. The Home Ministry was recommended by IB to mount another round of operations to soften up the fringe elements.
The then Union Minister of State for Home Subodh Kant Sahai on a tour of the State was informed by Governor D.D.Thakur that a section of ULFA headed by publicity secretary, Sunil Nath was ready for negotiations with the government. This move was based on certain false indices. Thakur’s legal acumen was not matched by his political wisdom,” Dhar said.
The ULFA was already sucked into the ISI and DGFI network. The internal security imbroglio in Assam had acquired foreign support.

Hindu fanatic organisation - BJYM flays Cong on police recruitment

GUWAHATI, Feb 12: The Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) today alleged that the Congress had started the recruitment process in the Assam Police in order to strengthen the party fund for the Assembly elections in 2006. Talking to the newsmen here, BJYM president Jayanta Kumar Das said that rampant corruption and nepotism during the constable recruitment process resulted in much resentment not only among the public but also among the rank and file of the Congress party.
Flaying the Minister of State for Planning and Development, Himanta Biswa Sarma, for his comment against BJP NE organizing secretary V Satish, Das said that the Minister has levelled baseless allegations following the widespread protests and sufficient proof of rampant corruption in the recruitment process.
Sarma said that Satish had no right to comment on the police recruitment process as he is not from the State. Pointing out that Dr Manmohan Singh and Mani Kumar Subba were also not from Assam, Das said that Satish was associated with Assam since 1978 when he started working for the Akhil Bharatiya Bidyarthi Parishad. Satish was also associated with Assam Agitation, he added.

What about the BJP - who during their ruin in power , what were their corruption and nepotism , Mr Das and Mr Satish have forgetten and they are blaming baseless to others without any base . BJP , BJYM and their sisters organisation should be ban from all over northeast and to limit their influence only in the hindi speaking region . For all these , to stand against all these hindu fanatic , native people from northeast should stand against them . How can all these people propogate their idea - people should think about this very important point .
Your caments : asimhazarika@gawab.com

Manipur NSUI unit warns Meitei script supporters

IMPHAL, Feb 12 – National Students’ Union of India, Manipur unit has threatened to take up legal proceedings against the Meitei Erol Eyek Loinasillon Apunba Lup, Kangleipak (MEELSAL), an organisation campaigning for popularisation of the Meitei script, for setting afire the books written in the Bengali script.General secretary of the NSUI, Manipur unit S Dorendra told newsmen at his office here on Friday that his organisation is ready to take legal proceedings against the setting and destroying of the books in Bengali script in the bonfires in the Meitei Mayek (Manipuri script) promotion campaigns which were intensified since Thursday, with the burning of thousands of books at different locations in the state. The general secretary said that his organisation has supported the campaign for promotion of the regional language and its script but condemned the actions of dishouring the other language and its script. Asked what legal proceedings would be taken up, the general secretary stated that if the MEELSAL intensified its campaigns for setting afire the books written in Bengali, then the NSUI will recourse to the court for dishonoring the other language and its script. He, however, refused to fix a date for the legal action.Interestingly, the MEELSAL has declared 2005 as the year of the Meitei script. The Bengali script has been in use in the state since King Pamheiba (1709-1748) burnt all books written in the Meitei script and introduced the Bengali script under the influence of missionary Shantidas Gosai who hailed from present day Bangladesh. The Meitei script campaign started during the 276th anniversary of Puya Meithaba (burning of Meitei books), observed at Palace Compound here on February 2.

India an emerging super power : Ghali

NEW DELHI, Feb 12 : Visualising India to be one of the super powers in the next 25 years, former UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali today said the development would help democratisation of the world body. “In the next 25 years, we will have new important states, among them new super powers India, China, Russia, USA and European Union,” he told reporters here. – PTI