GUWAHATI, Feb 25: Axom may soon have a separate university on Madrassa education. A clear signal in this regard has been given by Wazed Ali Choudhury, Minister for Minority and Sar Area Development.
Choudhury, who is the Chairman of the Madrassa Education Board, said that the Board has placed a proposal before the Sate Government recently for setting up a University on Madrassa education. The proposal is now under the active consideration of the State Government, he added.
In a related development, the State Government has decided to create a separate directorate for Madrassa education, Choudhury said. The proposal for the directorate is awaiting the approval of the Finance department, he said and added that the directorate will not put extra financial burden on the State exchequer as it will be within the administrative infrastructure of the Education department. But it will enjoy autonomy from the general education administration, the minister said.
Apart from the regular subjects, there will be some Arabic subjects in Madrassa education, and therefore, a separate directorate is a necessity for effective functioning of the education system, Choudhury added.
What is interesting is that where will be the propose university will be set up , what will be its function , what type of methodtology will it use and such . It will be the best to use arabic and english for all the subjects . For example all science subjects should be in english and the rest of the subject should be in arabic .
I would like to see the viewers opinion ; please write to asimhazarika@gawab.com
Saturday, February 26, 2005
Friday, February 25, 2005
Mossad's strategy ; anything wrong in the world ---- blame it on arabs
Top U.S. Army analysts believe the Israeli intelligence agency, the Mossad, to be "ruthless and cunning" and "a wildcard" that "has the capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
This declaration was reported on the front page of The Washington Times on September 10th 2001, just one day before the September 11th strikes on the U.S. which are blamed on "Arabs".
This charge reported by the paper was made by American Army officers in a 68 page report prepared by some 60 officers at the U.S. Army's School for Advanced Military Studies, a training ground for up-and-coming Army officers. Furthermore, just hours after the strikes hit America a well-known pro-Israel analyst George Friedman proclaimed on his website, "The big winner today, intended or not, is the state of Israel. There is no question that the Israeli leadership is feeling relief" in the wake of the terrorist attack on America as a result of the benefits that Israel will glean. The events of September 11th do require careful attention in light of the fact that Israel has had a long and proven record in planting "false flags"-orchestrated assassinations and acts of terrorism for its own purposes and pinning those atrocities on innocent parties. One of the most famous instances in which Israel used a "false flag" to cover its own trail was in the infamous Lavon Affair.
In 1954 several Israeli-orchestrated acts of terrorism against British targets in Egypt were carried out. Blame for the attacks was placed on the Muslim Brotherhood.
However, the truth about the wave of terror is found in a once-secret cable from Colonel Benjamin Givli, the head of Israel's military intelligence, who outlined the intended purpose behind the wave of terror: "[Our goal] is to break the West's confidence in the existing [Egyptian] regime. The actions should cause arrests, demonstrations, and expressions of revenge. The Israeli origin should be totally covered while attention should be shifted to any other possible factor. The purpose is to prevent economic and military aid from the West to Egypt." The full extent of Israel's involvement did become public and the government was rocked by the revelations.
More damaging though was the truth about Israel's use of a "false flag" had come to international attention and demonstrated how Israel was willing to endanger innocent lives as part of its grand political strategy to expand its influence in the Middle East. Placing the blame Israeli "false flags" have been used time and again to point the finger of blame on others, mainly Arabs.
On June 28, 1978, Israeli agents exploded a bomb under a small passenger car in the Rue Saint Anne in Paris, killing Mohammed Boudia, an organizer for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Immediately afterward, Paris police received anonymous phone calls accusing Boudia of involvement in narcotics deals and attributing his murder to the Corsican Mafia.
A thorough investigation subsequently established that Mossad special-action agents were responsible for the terrorist killing. Blame the Libyans
One of Israel's most outrageous "false flag" operations involved a wild propaganda story aimed at discrediting Libyan leader Muamar Qaddafi.
In the early months of Ronald Reagan's administration, the American media began 'promoting' a story that a "Libyan hit squad" was in the U.S. to assassinate the president. It goes without saying this piece of 'fact' inflamed public sentiment against Libya. Suddenly, however, the "hit squad" stories vanished.
It was discovered that the source of the story was one Manucher Ghorbanifar, a former Iranian SAVAK (secret police) agent who had very close ties to the Mossad.
But doubts were being raised about Ghorbanifar; with the Washington Post acknowledging the CIA itself believed he was a liar who "had made up the hit-squad story in order to cause problems for one of Israel's enemies." By then, the Los Angeles Times had already blown the whistle on Israel's scare stories.
The Times reported; "Israeli intelligence, not the Reagan administration, was a major source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Libyan assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S. officials . . . Israel, which informed sources said has 'wanted an excuse to go in and bash Libya for a longtime,' may be trying to build American public support for a strike against [Qaddafi]." In other words, Israel had been promoting the former SAVAK agent, Ghorbanifar, to Washington as a reliable source. When in fact, he was a Mossad disinformation operative waving a "false flag"-yet another Israeli scheme to blame Libya for its own misdeeds, using one "false flag" (Iran's SAVAK) to lay blame on another "false flag" (Libya).
Source: rense.com
This declaration was reported on the front page of The Washington Times on September 10th 2001, just one day before the September 11th strikes on the U.S. which are blamed on "Arabs".
This charge reported by the paper was made by American Army officers in a 68 page report prepared by some 60 officers at the U.S. Army's School for Advanced Military Studies, a training ground for up-and-coming Army officers. Furthermore, just hours after the strikes hit America a well-known pro-Israel analyst George Friedman proclaimed on his website, "The big winner today, intended or not, is the state of Israel. There is no question that the Israeli leadership is feeling relief" in the wake of the terrorist attack on America as a result of the benefits that Israel will glean. The events of September 11th do require careful attention in light of the fact that Israel has had a long and proven record in planting "false flags"-orchestrated assassinations and acts of terrorism for its own purposes and pinning those atrocities on innocent parties. One of the most famous instances in which Israel used a "false flag" to cover its own trail was in the infamous Lavon Affair.
In 1954 several Israeli-orchestrated acts of terrorism against British targets in Egypt were carried out. Blame for the attacks was placed on the Muslim Brotherhood.
However, the truth about the wave of terror is found in a once-secret cable from Colonel Benjamin Givli, the head of Israel's military intelligence, who outlined the intended purpose behind the wave of terror: "[Our goal] is to break the West's confidence in the existing [Egyptian] regime. The actions should cause arrests, demonstrations, and expressions of revenge. The Israeli origin should be totally covered while attention should be shifted to any other possible factor. The purpose is to prevent economic and military aid from the West to Egypt." The full extent of Israel's involvement did become public and the government was rocked by the revelations.
More damaging though was the truth about Israel's use of a "false flag" had come to international attention and demonstrated how Israel was willing to endanger innocent lives as part of its grand political strategy to expand its influence in the Middle East. Placing the blame Israeli "false flags" have been used time and again to point the finger of blame on others, mainly Arabs.
On June 28, 1978, Israeli agents exploded a bomb under a small passenger car in the Rue Saint Anne in Paris, killing Mohammed Boudia, an organizer for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Immediately afterward, Paris police received anonymous phone calls accusing Boudia of involvement in narcotics deals and attributing his murder to the Corsican Mafia.
A thorough investigation subsequently established that Mossad special-action agents were responsible for the terrorist killing. Blame the Libyans
One of Israel's most outrageous "false flag" operations involved a wild propaganda story aimed at discrediting Libyan leader Muamar Qaddafi.
In the early months of Ronald Reagan's administration, the American media began 'promoting' a story that a "Libyan hit squad" was in the U.S. to assassinate the president. It goes without saying this piece of 'fact' inflamed public sentiment against Libya. Suddenly, however, the "hit squad" stories vanished.
It was discovered that the source of the story was one Manucher Ghorbanifar, a former Iranian SAVAK (secret police) agent who had very close ties to the Mossad.
But doubts were being raised about Ghorbanifar; with the Washington Post acknowledging the CIA itself believed he was a liar who "had made up the hit-squad story in order to cause problems for one of Israel's enemies." By then, the Los Angeles Times had already blown the whistle on Israel's scare stories.
The Times reported; "Israeli intelligence, not the Reagan administration, was a major source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Libyan assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S. officials . . . Israel, which informed sources said has 'wanted an excuse to go in and bash Libya for a longtime,' may be trying to build American public support for a strike against [Qaddafi]." In other words, Israel had been promoting the former SAVAK agent, Ghorbanifar, to Washington as a reliable source. When in fact, he was a Mossad disinformation operative waving a "false flag"-yet another Israeli scheme to blame Libya for its own misdeeds, using one "false flag" (Iran's SAVAK) to lay blame on another "false flag" (Libya).
Source: rense.com
Sunday, February 20, 2005
UMI observes Hindi Day
United Muslim of India celebrated Hindi Day on 21 September and organised a discussion. Maulana Mohd Furqan Qasmi in his presidential speech said that Hindi used in official communications is difficult because it is Sanskrit oriented which needs to be made easy. Comrade V.Kumar said that the common language of the people in India is Hindustani written in Persian and Devnagri scripts known as Urdu and Hindi. He added that Muslims in northern India have accepted Hindi and even religious books are being written and translated in Hindi.
All these can be sucessful in north india but what about northeast or south india , over in the northeast about 15 million muslims lives , and majority of the population speaks asomia and the rest speaks different dialects , it will be better if all the muslims population from northeast speaks arabic .
All these can be sucessful in north india but what about northeast or south india , over in the northeast about 15 million muslims lives , and majority of the population speaks asomia and the rest speaks different dialects , it will be better if all the muslims population from northeast speaks arabic .
NE christians flay miniroty panel's report
GUWAHATI, Feb 19: The Christian community in the North-east has strongly reacted to the reported statement of the chairman of the National Commission for Minorities and alleged that the Commission, which was formed to safeguard the rights and interests of minorities, undermined its image. In a letter to the chairman of the Commission, Rev Thomas Menamparampil, Archbishop of Guwahati, Rev Ngul Khan Pau, general secretary of the Council of Baptist Churches, North-east India, Bishop Thomas Pullopilil, Allan Brooks of Catholic Council of India and Rev George Plathottam, President of the South Asian Catholic Press Association, expressed serious concern regarding the reported statement of the Commission chairman at Kochi where he had said that there had been abnormally high growth of Christian population in the North-east, particularly in the areas bordering Bangladesh. The memorandum further pointed out that the Commission never contacted the Church leaders of the North-east to verify the facts before making the statement.The memorandum said that the Commission, while discussing the census data pertaining to Christian community, used the data selectively, which raised a false alarm. The letter pointed out that it is common knowledge that the districts like Dhubri and Karimganj have very few Christians and a Christian family bringing up four children would result in 200 per cent growth. By the same yardstick, the Hindu population would show alarmingly high percentage of growth in places like Aizawl, Shillong, Kohima etc. The letter said that any study on growth should be carried out giving due attention to the ground realities.The Christian leaders of the North-east questioned the motives of the Commission in holding a seminar on the issue without any representation from the North-east and expressed their reservations about the hypothesis put forward by Prof Ashis Bose of the Expert Committee on Census data on religion. The data must be studied in the light of prevailing socio-cultural, ethnic and economic factors and merely citing data of growth percentage in selected pockets can be misleading, the letter added. The letter further said that any analysis should also take into consideration the phenomenon of migration of people from one place to other for various reasons.The Christian leaders alleged that several newspapers of the region had carried out biased reports of the seminar, thereby misleading the people.The leaders demanded that the Commission should send a full report on what transpired at the seminar at Kochi. They also demanded that the Commission chairman and members should refrain from making such statements and issue a clarification in this regard immediately.
UK hindu temple rocked by terror claims
ANI[ WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2005 12:53:58 PM ]
LONDON: The famous Swaminarayan Temple in North London has been accused of harbouring extremist groups, a claim that has been strenuously denied by the temple.
But the accusations have continued, which has found its echo in the British Parliament and local media. The allegations were made by a political activist, Jagdeesh Singh, who alleged that groups such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad have been allowed to use the temple as a base for extremist activity. Calling the VHP a terrorist outfit, he said the outfit was using the temple for its own ends. The Labour Friends of India, led by vice-president Andrew Dismore, protested in the House of Commons. "This House considers these allegations to be totally without foundation and abhorrent to a community which itself has suffered a terrorist attack. These allegations have also caused profound offence to the wider Hindu community in the UK," Dismore said. But Singh has stood by his claims. He was quoted by the Eastern Eye newspaper as saying: "Although there is no substantial or visual evidence that the temple is allowing these organisations to use facilities there, there have nevertheless been reports that the temple does indeed allow it to be used as a base for these groups' discussions." "We are not attacking the Hindu community as a whole, we simply want such right wing groups to be banned," he added. A spokesman for the temple, Yogesh Patel, maintained no outside groups have ever used their facilities. "We are deeply hurt and outraged by these false allegations. They are inflammatory and irresponsible and are utterly without foundation," he said. However, Singh is unrelenting. "We want to bring these groups to the attention of the Government and prompt action against them. There is substantial evidence that they wage a campaign of hatred and violence against minority communities in India," he says.
LONDON: The famous Swaminarayan Temple in North London has been accused of harbouring extremist groups, a claim that has been strenuously denied by the temple.
But the accusations have continued, which has found its echo in the British Parliament and local media. The allegations were made by a political activist, Jagdeesh Singh, who alleged that groups such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad have been allowed to use the temple as a base for extremist activity. Calling the VHP a terrorist outfit, he said the outfit was using the temple for its own ends. The Labour Friends of India, led by vice-president Andrew Dismore, protested in the House of Commons. "This House considers these allegations to be totally without foundation and abhorrent to a community which itself has suffered a terrorist attack. These allegations have also caused profound offence to the wider Hindu community in the UK," Dismore said. But Singh has stood by his claims. He was quoted by the Eastern Eye newspaper as saying: "Although there is no substantial or visual evidence that the temple is allowing these organisations to use facilities there, there have nevertheless been reports that the temple does indeed allow it to be used as a base for these groups' discussions." "We are not attacking the Hindu community as a whole, we simply want such right wing groups to be banned," he added. A spokesman for the temple, Yogesh Patel, maintained no outside groups have ever used their facilities. "We are deeply hurt and outraged by these false allegations. They are inflammatory and irresponsible and are utterly without foundation," he said. However, Singh is unrelenting. "We want to bring these groups to the attention of the Government and prompt action against them. There is substantial evidence that they wage a campaign of hatred and violence against minority communities in India," he says.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)